Here it is. Detailed comparison.

https://www.visualstudio.com/products/compare-visual-studio-2015-products-vs

My guess is Professional would suit all those except people who have to
have the best of everything. I don't know anyone like that. ;)

On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Craig van Nieuwkerk <[email protected]>
wrote:

> The only thing I missed in Professional when moving from Ultimate is
> CodeLens, but that is now moving to Professional as well.
>
> Craig
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Stephen Price <[email protected]
> > wrote:
>
>> Judging by those links and what I've read previously looks like the worst
>> place to be is Premium currently. Sure you get upgraded to Ultimate for
>> free but looks like the renewal is higher (when compared to the old Premium
>> prices). Sure you get Enterprise for cheaper than what Ultimate was but
>> that only seems a financial benefit for those already on Ultimate (not
>> Premium). If you were happy with what Premium gave you then you are out of
>> luck, you are being forced to choose between Professional or Enterprise.
>> I do believe a lot of the functionality that's currently only in Ultimate
>> or Premium is being moved down a tier so I would have a look at what the
>> new Professional gives you. You might find it covers what you need and you
>> are in fact up for a savings.
>> Some research is in order. Perhaps there is a detailed comparison,
>> feature by feature, between the old and the new.
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 7:56 AM, Greg Keogh <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Perhaps the price rise is due to upcoming changes to the VS 2015
>>>> editions? Just a guess.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Good guess, I just received the following clarification:
>>>
>>> Just want to advise you as well that starting May 1, VS Premium and VS
>>> Ultimate will no longer be available. This will be replace by VS
>>> Enterprise. VS Enterprise is a combination of Premium and Ultimate,
>>> meaning if you have Premium you will have an automatic access to the
>>> features of Ultimate without additional cost.
>>>
>>> *Greg K*
>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to