Hi, Googling PatchD finds some stuff you can read (from memory – looked this up for a friend several months ago).
That all said, if there was some way of magically reducing harmful emissions by 75%+ for the cost of some cheap raw materials, every phone manufacturer would have already done it. It’d cost them a few cents to implement, and they could market their phones as having 75% fewer harmful emissions. Basically, these things are a scam. From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On Behalf Of Bec C Sent: Friday, 19 February 2016 6:42 PM To: ozDotNet <ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com> Subject: Re: [OT] Patchd radiation reducer Where would I even look for the current scientific data? Cheers On Friday, 19 February 2016, Greg Keogh <gfke...@gmail.com<mailto:gfke...@gmail.com>> wrote: Has any body any information about how well the Patchd radiation reducing thing works? I can't seem to find much info besides the main site patchd.com<http://patchd.com> It's an old scam that feeds off fear. The Federal Government’s safety watchdog, the Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA), does not recommend the use of products that attach to a phone and advertised as neutralising any harmful effects. “The claims are not consistent with current scientific knowledge and it is difficult, if not impossible, to verify any benefits,” it says in a fact sheet. Greg
