We’re just in process of publish an app written in Angular 2, so yes, 
definitely taking it seriously. A lot of pain upgrading from Beta/RC to RTM 
(it’s like they didn’t understand what Beta/RC means).

Nick Randolph | Built to Roam Pty Ltd | Microsoft MVP – Windows Platform 
Development | +61 412 413 425 | @thenickrandolph | skype:nick_randolph
The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email 
in any way. Built to Roam Pty Ltd does not guarantee the integrity of any 
emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own 
and may not reflect the views or opinions of Built to Roam Pty Ltd.

From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On 
Behalf Of Tom P
Sent: Thursday, 13 October 2016 3:05 PM
To: ozDotNet <ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com>
Subject: Re: [OT] Angular certification

Angular 2 is entirely redone. TypeScript makes it also bearable


On 13 October 2016 at 14:54, Greg Keogh 
<gfke...@gmail.com<mailto:gfke...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Are there any Angular certifications you guys can recommend that may be taken 

Can anyone even take Angular seriously?!

I thought it was already abandoned by the author who went off to write a new 
competing BlahJS, or is a new group completely rewriting it to Angular 2, or 
something like that? They all blur together.


Reply via email to