slightly topical link....

How it feels to learn JavaScript in 2016
<https://hackernoon.com/how-it-feels-to-learn-javascript-in-2016-d3a717dd577f#.5nwsdvmrq>



On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Craig van Nieuwkerk <crai...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> RC is the new Alpha.
>
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Nick Randolph <n...@builttoroam.com>
> wrote:
>
>> We’re just in process of publish an app written in Angular 2, so yes,
>> definitely taking it seriously. A lot of pain upgrading from Beta/RC to RTM
>> (it’s like they didn’t understand what Beta/RC means).
>>
>>
>>
>> *Nick Randolph* | *Built to Roam Pty Ltd* | Microsoft MVP – Windows
>> Platform Development | +61 412 413 425 | @thenickrandolph |
>> skype:nick_randolph
>> The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not
>> the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
>> email in any way. Built to Roam Pty Ltd does not guarantee the integrity of
>> any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the
>> author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Built to Roam Pty
>> Ltd.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-bounces@ozdot
>> net.com] *On Behalf Of *Tom P
>> *Sent:* Thursday, 13 October 2016 3:05 PM
>> *To:* ozDotNet <ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com>
>> *Subject:* Re: [OT] Angular certification
>>
>>
>>
>> Angular 2 is entirely redone. TypeScript makes it also bearable
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Tom
>>
>>
>>
>> On 13 October 2016 at 14:54, Greg Keogh <gfke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Are there any Angular certifications you guys can recommend that may be
>> taken seriously?
>>
>>
>>
>> Can anyone even take Angular seriously?!
>>
>>
>>
>> I thought it was already abandoned by the author who went off to write a
>> new competing BlahJS, or is a new group completely rewriting it to Angular
>> 2, or something like that? They all blur together.
>>
>>
>>
>> *GK*
>>
>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to