Talking of old processors - did you guys see this?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AZb4NLXx1aM

It's very low tech (Z80) and he boots it up on a bread board. Sort of what
you'd expect of that really old stuff on those probes.


regards,
Preet, in Auckland NZ


On 6 January 2017 at 21:09, Davy Jones <djones...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Pathfinder (1996) was a very low tech / love cost proof of concept
> mission, so a hardened 8 bit processor is not out of the question. Nasa
> doesn't use of the shelf chips. In it's craft. That's why you will see
> laptops all over the place in Nasa footage, they don't meet the radiation
> proof specs of Nasa but are not mission critical.
> Converting. A - 65 to hex I would need a chart too, or a bit of paper and
> a pen.
>
> Davy
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On 6 Jan 2017, at 03:13, Greg Keogh <gfke...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Folks, we watched The Martian last night on a friend's huge TV with 3-D
> glasses (which really work, it's a technical marvel). Fabulous looking
> movie, a bit too long, clearly targeted for the big screen and those sorts
> of audiences, science stretched to the limits of credibility but you don't
> really care.
> >
> > I noticed that IT played a small co-starring role. One astrophysicist
> boffin was huddled in the corridor of a super-computer centre with his
> laptop plugged directly into one of the racks running slingshot orbit
> simulations (is it faster that way?). Matt Damon communicating with a
> camera pointing to base-16 placards (he shamefully needed an ASCII chart to
> decode the digits).
> >
> > Matt is using a hex editor at one point to directly to allow cross-probe
> communication. I'm not sure if that hex was actually anything like
> recognisable machine code, or it was real Mars Rover code from 2006 (did it
> use a well-known chip and OS?)
> >
> > One lady in the mothership's crew must have been a highly skilled
> programmer, as she had to do some emergency drastic refactoring of some
> sort (I can't remember the details now).
> >
> > A bit of cryptography/steganography ... a NASA guy sent a secret message
> to one of the crew using a fake broken email attachment, but the message
> was simply encoded as hex digits.
> >
> > There were lots of quick screen-shots showing nice graphics and source
> code. Luckily they avoided the cliché of having ludicrous complicated
> meaningless screens full of little windows and scrolling hex dumps (as in
> most action movies, like Die Hard 4). I'm sure I noticed some actual LISP
> code at one point, it was quick, but there were many lines of giveaway
> (((()))). A few other times I saw function definitions in lower case with
> underscores, so perhaps it was Python, but it was too quick to be sure.
> >
> > Greg K
>

Reply via email to