Yea but at least you had a chance. Now you have none: the solution provided
presently is inferior to anything you could have already got, and is
certainly not even as good as Telstra cable provided 10 years ago. Also,
the present system just blew all the money on obsolete technology that
can't be upgraded, when they could have spent that money on getting at
least some of the network correct.

On 5 Jan 2018 4:24 PM, "Greg Low" <g...@greglow.com> wrote:

Yes, but when? As we were a cable area (where I was at the time), we
weren't even on the planning roadmap. Far more chance of having fibre if I
was out the back of Ballarat, in Armidale, or at the beach in Coffs
Harbour. I can still get fibre to the house at the beach there, but looks
like no chance at all in suburban Melbourne.



And the poor sods living in a cable area who couldn't even get cable were
really SOL.



Mind you, by now, I would have been living at Sapphire Beach or somewhere
with fibre, but the better half couldn't deal with the idea of a move at
the time. (And ironically now thinks it might be a good idea…)



To get connected at the time, you needed to be in a rural marginal
electorate, or in Tony Windsor's electorate. Rudd/Conroy had also
predicated it on becoming commercially viable quite quickly. That also was
never going to happen, particularly when they were stringing fibre in low
density areas first.



Regards,



Greg



Dr Greg Low



1300SQLSQL (1300 775 775) office | +61 419201410 mobile│ +61 3 8676 4913 fax

SQL Down Under | Web: www.sqldownunder.com |http://greglow.me



*From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
*On Behalf Of *Tony Wright
*Sent:* Friday, 5 January 2018 6:46 PM

*To:* ozDotNet <ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com>
*Subject:* Re: [OT] Internet use on 4G LTE



I think you would have been better off with the one you think wouldn't have
arrived. At least what would have been delivered was at least upgradable
and future proof. Nbn fttp at my brothers house is pretty good.



On 5 Jan 2018 1:12 PM, "Greg Low" <g...@greglow.com> wrote:

Hard to know if I’m better off with a network that wouldn’t have arrived in
my working lifetime, or a hopeless one. Neither would have given me what I
needed.



I would have happily paid many thousands for a connection and a few hundred
per month if it actually arrived and worked, but I’m guessing that’s the
minority.



We should have just taken it as a nation building program and funded and
resourced it appropriately.



Regards,



Greg



Dr Greg Low

1300SQLSQL (1300 775 775) office | +61 419201410 mobile│ +61 3 8676 4913 fax

SQL Down Under | Web: www.sqldownunder.com
------------------------------

*From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com <ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com> on
behalf of Tony Wright <tonyw...@gmail.com>
*Sent:* Friday, January 5, 2018 4:21:54 PM
*To:* ozDotNet
*Subject:* RE: [OT] Internet use on 4G LTE



That was the ramp up phase though. It was always going to take some time to
ramp up. Look at what the alternative gave us: a two year delay and a
network that's not fit for purpose. Even if they kept the old network and
simply rolled it out slower we would have been better off. In fact, I think
that's what people really wanted - better management. But we didn't end up
getting that, the Liberals simply showed us they were just as bad if not
worse at managing that project than Labor. Who would have thought?



On 5 Jan 2018 11:54 AM, "Greg Low" <g...@greglow.com> wrote:

I remember well the day he proudly announced that his fibre had now passed
1000 houses in Perth. Someone asked him how many could actually connect.
Eventually the answer was 16.



Regards,



Greg



Dr Greg Low



1300SQLSQL (1300 775 775) office | +61 419201410 mobile│ +61 3 8676 4913 fax

SQL Down Under | Web: www.sqldownunder.com |http://greglow.me



*From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
*On Behalf Of *David Connors
*Sent:* Friday, 5 January 2018 3:49 PM
*To:* ozDotNet <ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com>
*Subject:* Re: [OT] Internet use on 4G LTE



On Fri, 5 Jan 2018 at 14:45 Tony Wright <tonyw...@gmail.com> wrote:

The hilarity of Labor being better negotiators, and the libs capitulating
and handing over money they didn't have to.



Oh they handed over a crap load of money. I think given the choice Telstra
would have done no deal at all, except for the strategic importance of RF
spectrum.



Conroy isn't exactly a respected figure. In retrospect, maybe he and
Telstra were a match made in heaven.



 http://www.smh.com.au/it-pro/government-it/senators-red-
undie-remarks-fall-flat-in-new-york-20120928-26pqt.html





-- 

David Connors
da...@connors.com | @davidconnors | https://t.me/davidconnors
| LinkedIn | +61 417 189 363

Reply via email to