It is indeed sad that an internet site entitled "quackwatch" could be even remotely considered an appropriate reference for modality.  The information contained is misleading, some is factualy inaccurate.  How can a group belonging to the "Skeptic Ring" who are clearly biased be taken seriously??
 
Mary-Clare Switz
----- Original Message -----
From: Bruce Ford
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2001 2:29 AM
Subject: Reflexology

Information on reflexology and other "complimentary" practices such as applied kinesiology, iris diagnosis, Bach flowers, homeopathy, accupuncture), including the results of clinical trials and the relevance of standards and training promulgated by industry groups such as the PRA can be obtained from www.quackwatch.com
 
Bruce Ford

Reply via email to