> 
> 3) News Flashes
> 
> Researchers collected data on self-reported cigarette use and urine
> cotinine concentration from 1583 pregnant smokers at the time of study
> enrollment--at the first or second prenatal visit regardless of
> gestational age--and in the third trimester. As indicated by urine
> cotinine measurement, 1349 women were actively smoking at enrollment
> and 234 were not. Women who quit smoking before enrollment and those
> who quit after enrollment delivered infants with the highest adjusted
> mean birth weights (3492 and 3491 g, respectively). Women who reduced
> their cigarette use had a mean adjusted infant birth weight 32 g
> heavier compared with those who did not change their cigarette use,
> but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.33).
> Infant birth weight initially declined sharply as third-trimester
> cigarette use increased. However, the decline leveled off at more than
> eight cigarettes per day. -Am J Epidemiol 2001;154:694-701
> 
> 
> =PLEASE SUPPORT OUR SPONSORS!=
> 
=
> 
> 
> 4) Effects of Labor Drugs
> 
> The risks of epidurals convert normal labor to a high-tech event. An
> IV must be started to help counteract the tendency of epidurals to
> cause hypotension. Electronic fetal monitoring is necessary because
> epidurals can cause fetal distress, and the mother's vital signs must
> be closely monitored to warn of maternal adverse reactions. If the
> needle or catheter pierces a blood vessel, which is easy to do in
> pregnancy because blood vessels are enlarged, or the needle goes
> deeper than the epidural space, convulsions, respiratory paralysis,
> and/or cardiac arrest can occur. Tests are done to confirm proper
> placement before giving the full dosage, but these are not completely
> preventative. Trained personnel, resuscitation equipment, and
> medication must be immediately available.
> 
> In labor, epidurals increase the need for oxytocin, instrumental
> delivery, episiotomy, and bladder catheterization. The first-time
> mother is more likely to have a cesarean. Temporary postpartum
> complications include urinary incontinence, nerve injury causing
> muscle weakness or abnormal sensation, and headache that can last for
> days and is excruciatingly painful. Instrumental delivery and
> episiotomy increase the probability of deep perineal tears. Backache
> and headache may become chronic. In the newborn, epidurals may cause
> jaundice, and there may be adverse behavioral effects. -Henci Goer,
> Obtetric Myths Versus Research Realities, Bergin & Garvey 1995
> ====
> 
> Induction with Cytotec should never be attempted anywhere, most
> especially in out-of-hospital settings. Incredibly, the American
> College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recently approved
> Cytotec induction in spite of lack of FDA approval; in spite of a
> letter to doctors from Searle, the manufacturer of Cytotec, imploring
> doctors not to use it for induction; in spite of lack of approval from
> the Cochrane Library (the best scientific opinion); and in spite of
> the fact that it is not approved or used for induction in any country
> in Western Europe.
> 
> ACOG quotes studies of Cytotec induction, none of which have a
> sufficient number of research subjects, and consequently none of the
> studies quoted have sufficient statistical power to detect small but
> potentially important risks such as uterine hyperstimulation and
> uterine rupture. Furthermore, because published studies of Cytotec
> induction have such wide methodological variability, meta-analysis is
> impossible and the published attempts at such meta-analysis are
> seriously flawed.... Midwives should stay as far away as possible from
> such vigilante obstetrics --obstetricians taking matters into their
> own hands while ignoring the recommendations of the real judges.
> -excerpted from "Midwives and Cytotec: A True Story, by Marsden
> Wagner, MD, Midwifery Today Issue 57
> ====
> 
> 7) Question of the Week (Repeated)
> 
> Q: Does anyone have experience with pregnancy coexisting with kidney
> stones? My lady had kidney stones with her first pregnancy. There has
> been a recurrence with her second pregnancy. Her urologist felt it
> necessary to insert a nephrostomy tube to remain in for the duration
> of the pregnancy whereupon she'll probably have lithrodisropy. Her
> pregnancy is normal and she wishes to have a vaginal delivery. I wish
> to support her in this and am hoping there are some of my sister
> midwives who've taken care of ladies like this. -Anne Walters, CNM
> ====
> 
> Q: When you attend homebirths, what do you keep in your kit ahead of
> time for those unexpected, middle-of-the-night calls? And what is the
> most effective way to organize and carry your materials and supplies?
> -B.H.
> 
> 9) Switchboard
> In response to the link between obstetric drug use and future
> substance abuse in the baby: This possibility is explored in Michel
> Odent's video "Midwives, Lullabies, and Mother Earth." A doctor
> presented a graph, presumably of his data, showing how the baby's risk
> of later drug use jumped with each dose of meds given.
> -Melissa Schuppe
>  Virginia
> ====
> 
> For midwives interested in the long-term effects of drugs in the pre-
> and perinatal period (including drugs in labour) I refer them to the
> writing of Stanislav Grof. He refers to studies and his own work in
> Holotropic Breathwork on the effects of birth trauma, drugs etc. in
> these and other of his books:
> 
> -Psychology of the Future: Lessons from Modern Consciousness Studies,
> State University of New York Press, 2000.
> -The Holotropic Mind, (with Hal Zina Bennett), Harper, San Francisco,
> 1990.
> -The Stormy Search for The Self, Thorsons, 1991 (with his wife
> Christina Grof).
> 
> I have found Grof's work and transpersonal psychology to be a very
> useful theoretical framework in which to capture the essence of many
> birth experiences I have shared with women and their babies.
> 
> I am an independent midwife in Canberra, Australia, and have been
> attending homebirths here for 14 years. At present,
> homebirth/independent midwives are having difficulty obtaining
> professional indemnity insurance so I have closed my practice for a
> while.
> -Emma Baldock
> ====
> 
> In regard to Claire's letter about the relationship between use of
> epidurals in labor and later drug dependency in the children (Issue
> 3:47) and the letters from Melissa Jonas and Natalie Bjorkland
> disputing this (Issue 3:48), I offer the following research study
> reported in Epidemiology 2000;11:715-716.
> 
> Maternal Medication During Labor May Affect Offspring's Drug
> Dependency
> 
> Women who wish to lower their offspring's risk of drug abuse may
> decide to forego some of their own drug use during labor and delivery,
> according to the results of a prospective study. Dr. Karin Nyberg, of
> the University of Goteborg in Sweden, and associates evaluated data
> collected on children born between 1959 and 1966. Of the 693 subjects
> ages 18 to 27 years who were interviewed, 69 met DSM-III diagnostic
> criteria for drug abuse and/or dependence on cocaine, hallucinogens,
> narcotics or other drugs. Thirty-three non-drug abusing siblings
> served as controls. 
> 
> Multiple doses of strong pain medication were used during labor
> preceding the birth of 23% of the drug abusers and 6% of the controls.
> The researchers estimated an unadjusted odds ratio of 4.7 for drug
> dependency in offspring whose mothers received at least three doses of
> opiates or barbiturates within 10 hours of birth. The occurrence of
> meconium-stained amniotic fluid was also associated with an elevated
> risk of drug dependence, but this was confounded by prenatal drug
> exposure in 5 of 17 cases. Other potential factors - prolonged labor,
> asphyxia, birth order, and low birthweight - were similar among cases
> and controls. Dr. Nyberg and her colleagues report that their results
> replicate previous findings in humans and animals regarding prenatal
> exposure to high doses of medications at birth and adult offspring's
> drug dependence.
> 
> Additionally, Beverly Lawrence Beech wrote to this topic in her paper
> "Drugs in Labor: What Effects Do They Have Twenty Years Hence?"
> 
> "...In a well-designed case control study at the Karolinska Institute
> in Stockholm in 1990, researchers compared children exposed to
> pain-relieving drugs in labor with those who were not and discovered
> an increased risk of drug addiction later in life (Jacobson et al.,
> 1990). In 1988 they showed that when nitrous oxide was given to the
> mother, the child was five and a half times more likely to become an
> amphetamine addict than a brother or sister born to the same parents.
> In their paper in the British Medical Journal (1990), patients who had
> died from opiate addiction were compared with brothers and sisters;
> the researchers found that if the mothers had been given opiates or
> barbiturates or larger doses of nitrous oxide the risk of opiate
> addiction to the child in later life was increased 4.7 times. In a
> further study, researchers discovered that the risk of drug addiction
> was related to the hospital in which they were born. In other words,
> the likelihood of a child developing drug addiction in later life
> depended on the labor ward policies of the hospital the mother chose
> for the birth, and I quote: "For the amphetamine addicts, hospital of
> birth was found to be an important risk factor even after controlling
> for residential area" (Nyberg, 1993). Jacobson and Nyberg's research
> suggests that the use of opiates, barbiturates and nitrous oxide in
> labor causes imprinting in the babies, and we are now reaping the
> whirlwind...."
> 
> She quoted the following studies as her references:
> 
> Jacobson, B. et al. (1990). Opiate addiction in adult offspring
> through possible imprinting after obstetric treatment. British Medical
> Journal, 301:1067-1070.
> Nyberg, K. et al. (1993). Obstetric medication versus residential area
> as perinatal risk factors for subsequent adult drug addiction in
> offspring. Pediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 7: 2332.
> 
> Are we sure we can separate the effects of different pain-relieving
> drugs from the effects of epidurals? Is it truly worth taking the
> risk? There should always be a weighing of the risk-benefit factors. I
> believe there is a time when an epidural is worth the risk - but I
> know they are much overused in the United States and I have serious
> questions about the ethics of encouraging mothers to sign up in
> advance for their epidurals during their childbirth education classes.
> I assist at both hospital and homebirths where moms are supported
> through their labors with no drugs whatsoever and have beautiful
> drug-free birth experiences! Of the 31 vaginal births I've attended,
> 24 moms have elected not to have an epidural (or other drugs) - 77% -
> and 5 of the 7 who elected to have epidurals had labors exceeding 18
> hours. Someone said recently that you can't control birth, but you can
> make an impact on how it will be by your thoughts and feelings. That's
> an awesome responsibility for doulas and midwives!
> -Helen Moore, CD(DONA)
>  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ====
> 
> I was homebirthed but I feel some of the symptoms Claire mentioned,
> i.e., "feeling disconnected from their bodies, fuzzy thinking when
> under stress, feeling inadequate and incapable of completing things
> they start" so I didn't give these symptoms much credence and almost
> skipped the rest of her piece. In the end, I did like what she said
> about making sure that the mother is informed of the possible risks of
> any intervention. This is so important.
> 
> I had read about the risk of epidural and increased incidence of
> substance abuse in an issue of Mothering magazine (No. 99 Mar/Apr
> 2000). The article by Beverley Lawrence Beech cites studies that found
> an increase risk of substance abuse for those babies delivered
> anesthetized [see above].
> 
> In another article in the same issue, Penny Simkin writes that an
> epidural puts the baby at the risk of the following: bradycardia and
> hypoxia; tachycardia and fever; subtle changes in newborn reflexes and
> neurobehavior, including suckling; more difficulty in self-soothing or
> being consoled. She lists a few references in her article.
> - Colleen Morris
> ====
> 
> Regarding the tummy exercises mentioned in Issue 3:47 for diastasis of
> the rectus abdominii: It is important to EXHALE your breath while
> flexing; that is, breathe out when you pull yourself up into the
> crunch and flex the abdominal muscles. The exercises are much more
> effective that way.
> 
> I was taught a low stress/high result version of the exercise: lying
> on back on firm surface with hands behind head, pelvis tilted, then
> exhale and raise your head and shoulders just a little while pulling
> your abdominal muscles in toward the spine. Then inhale while
> relaxing. Do this several times per day for as many repetitions as you
> find comfortable.  Remembering an ounce of prevention, we might add
> the exercises prenatally and before pregnancy, as well, along with our
> Kegels.
> -Julia Swart
> ====
> ====
> 
> For separated abdominal muscles: You may want to consider some herbs
> not only to help your muscles heal but also to help you recover from
> your pregnancy. Astragalus and Cordyceps would be great for you. A
> formula called Bu Zhong Yi Qi Tang (Ginseng and Astragalus Combination
> - it usually doesn't contain ginseng) would probably benefit your
> muscles and help your energy. Cordyceps is a great herb to help
> nourish your primal energy, which women lose during childbirth. There
> are many herbs that can do this.
>  
> It would be best if readers see a licensed acupuncturist or Chinese
> herbalist for the herbs. As every person is individual, it is
> difficult to say what would be the best dose. Also, every herb company
> will have different recommended doses for their formulas so it is best
> to follow manufacturer suggested doses unless otherwise advised. Doses
> are usually 6-12 grams boiled in 2 - 3 cups of water. 
> -Colleen Morris, L.Ac
> ====
> 
> 
> 

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe.

Reply via email to