|
Dear Jo
I am always interested in what I see as the
hysteria that surrounds the Strep B debate. I work in a private hospital and the
women here are all under the care of their own Dr. The hospital itself does not
have a policy regrading treatment of strep B as each Dr has trained under
a different system. They keep up to date and are aware of current treatment
options practised at the public hospitals in surrounding suburbs. I trained in a
public system which treated all women who were positive with antibiotics in
labour and was horrified the first time I saw a Dr ignore this "rule".
That was many years ago.
Some Dr's still treat known Strep B women in labour
this way, most do not. We watch the infant
closely and treat the infant, if an infant is affected they will usually develop
symptoms of illness within the first 24 hours. I have not seen many babes who
succumb to Strep B infections in the last 20 years and of these, many of
the mothers have been of unknown status at birth as most of the Dr's do not
subject women to vag swabs in pregnancy.
I am not trying to minimise the risks which Strep B
will bring to some infants, but I personally think that this risk is overated
for the majority of women and their babes,
and the option which we follow is a safe
alternative to intervening in pregnancy and labour
Regards
Alesa
Alesa
Koziol
Clinical Midwifery Educator Melbourne |
- Re: Strep B P & A Koziol
- Re: Strep B Jo Slamen
- RE: Strep B P & A Koziol
