|
Greetings to everyone on the list.
I'm new to the list. I'm expecting my third
child due in March. I've had 2 c-sections previously and was automatically
told that consequtive pregnancies will be c-sections. I am not comfortable
with this and have started searching for midwives who will attend
homebirths.
Until recently, I suppressed the past experiences
and am now endeavouring to gather my hospital notes to ascertain the reasons
for the previous c-sections.
In the meantime, I'm ringing around to arrange
"interviewing" potential attendants. Thus far, I was able to contact two
out of my list and both suggest getting an ultrasound and having an ob/gyn
advise on the percentage risk of uterine rupture. I was under the
impression, like pelvimetry, this kind of test is inconclusive as
well.
Can anyone tell me if this test is standard or even
required in order to proceed with interviewing for homebirth
midwives?
I'm prepared for the possiblity of a c-section;
however I am cynical about getting a test done if it is in aid of condoning
another c-section in the environment of insurance crisis.
I am not sure the "right questions" to ask and do
hope I am not offending anyone on the list by my concerns.
Your advise would be greatly appreciated as a
pursue my birthing options.
Kind regards,
Becky
|
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Reply required urgently: determining ris... paul dunwell
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Reply required urgently: determinin... Lynne Staff
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Reply required urgently: determ... paul dunwell
- RE: [ozmidwifery] Reply required urgently: determinin... Robyn Thompson
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Reply required urgently: determ... paul dunwell
- RE: [ozmidwifery] Reply required urgently: de... Vicki Chan
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Reply required urgently:... paul dunwell
- [ozmidwifery] Becky Vicki Chan
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Reply required urgently: determinin... Lois Wattis
- RE: [ozmidwifery] Reply required urgently: determinin... Sally Westbury
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Reply required urgently: determinin... Lynne Staff
