Dear List,
It sounds like it would be safer to both babe and
mother.When though will we hear about how accurate it
is?Other tests have been found  to not be 100%.Is this
just another cost to the maternity bill with little
benifit?Ann --- Debby M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote: 
<HR>
<html><div style='background-color:'><DIV>
<P>I saw on the news the other night that they have
developed in Australia a new ante natal testing
technique for assessing embryo/fetal genetic profile
for early diagnosis of problems.&nbsp; It is said to
be safe for mother and baby and involves taking cells
from the mother's cervix which have been found to have
the fetal genetic profile - although how fetal cells
would get on the cervix is beyond me unless they are
shed from the gestational sac and are pushed out
through the mucus plug.</P>
<P>Great for avoiding amniocentisis and CVS but I must
admit to wondering how soon it will be before this
test becomes as routine as 12 and 20 week ultrasounds
etc.</P>
<P>Debby</P></DIV></div><br clear=all><hr>Get faster
connections�-- switch to�MSN Internet Access! <a
href="http://g.msn.com/8HMDEN/2017";>Click Here</a>
</html>
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or
unsubscribe. 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe.

Reply via email to