|
Brief: DPLAUTOMEDIA MONITORSPhone: 02 6239 5233 Sydney Morning Herald Thursday 26/6/2003General News Page 12 Circulation : 253,740Size: 195.44 sq.cms. No doctor in the houseMidwives already deliver babies on their own. Millions of them. What is radical about the �midwives only� bnthplan for the state�s public hospitals is that a doctor d nolonger be required to be on duty or on call. Midwives atShellharbour hospital, which has been unable to fill itsohsterna roster, are expected to be the first grantedpermission by NSW Health to deliver alone. Similarstaffing problems at other regional and rural hospitals, hr jwever, mean a quick flow-on is likely.In these hospitals, midwives will decide when to callior an anibulance transfer to a larger hospital during addficult birth. This is the most risky time to put women inlabour on the road. The success of the proposal, then, must rest on the implementation of sttict guidelines to ensure a transfer occurs when problems arefirst indicated. This means before an emergency, not dunng one. There is much to be said for giving midwives greaterresponsibilq in birthing. NSW Health says the �midwives only� buth plan is part of an expected shake-up in public matemty services. Midwives would be assigned tomtiividual patients throughout their pregnancy, rathertltm allotted to rotating shifts in the labour ward.�Llidwves have long been lobbying for this kind ofenhanced responsibhq, and have cited the impersonal roster system as a reason for leaving the profession.Mothers tended by midwives they know well are also happier and less likely to have caesarean buths.High-risk pregnancies would not qualify for the midwifeonlyservice. There are more than enough doctors in NSW to coverall births. Why is such a step needed? Recent increases in medical indemnity insurance premiums have pushed many GPs - and some obstetticians - out of obstetrics.But, other issues, such as the clustering of doctors in citiesand the larger incomes private city practices offer, havecontributed to an uneven distribution of services.The midwife birthing plan is not a solution, but a reasonable, practical measure whch is already working in,wme parts of Britain and Canada. Crucial to thesafety of mothers and babies is a well-funded and well rmambulance service, and close contact with the nearest hospital with a full obstemc service. NSW Healthshould also consider the British model, which acceptsthat high-speed transfers might sometimes be required to bring a doctor to a women in labour, not just the otherway round. Ref: 81 27057 |
