There is a very similar article in today's Melbourne Herald-sun....( page
17 - Mums-to-be face crisis)  "what are all these women going to do with no
doctors to deliver their babies"......
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Andrea Robertson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2003 8:09 AM
Subject: [ozmidwifery] Interesting stats on doctors quitting


> This article appears in today's (Saturday) Sydney Morning Herald. What is
> interesting (amongst other things) is the assumption that the public
system
> won't cope with the extra numbers of women who are not using the private
> hospitals. These numbers are not high, in the overall scheme of 250,000
> babies born each year in Australia. When you think how much these few
women
> cost the taxpayer from over-servicing (i.e. unnecessary interventions) by
> obstetricians, we might all be better off if they just use our excellent
> public hospitals!
>
> Andrea
>
> --------------------------
>
> Pressure to deliver - the private crisis
>
> By Ruth Pollard, Health Writer
> August 23, 2003
>
> Almost half the country's obstetricians are planning to abandon private
> practice in the next five years, affecting the delivery of up to 17,000
> babies by 2008.
>
> Some will enter the public hospital system and others will practise
> gynaecology and related specialties.
>
> But it was not just medical indemnity that was driving the doctors away,
it
> was the constant pressures of practice and its impact on family life, a
> survey by the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians
and
> Gynaecologists found.
>
> The college's president, Andrew Child, said the drift from private
practice
> illustrated a cultural change within the profession.
>
> "It is that commitment in private obstetrics to being available 24 hours a
> day, seven days a week
> for your patients, particularly for solo practitioners, that affects
> people," Dr Child said.
>
> "It is possibly a generational thing: the concept of being on call 168
> hours per week is something              that the younger generation just
> won't consider."
>                                                          >
>
> When obstetrician Amanda Dennis and her husband decided to have a family,
> she knew she could not balance her family life with private practice
> on-call work. She quit private obstetrcs on July 1 and now practises in
the
> public system.
>
> "I could not . . . be on call 24 hours a day and be pregnant or have a
> young child, even with a nanny even if my husband was prepared not to
work.
>
> "My life was chaos most of the time . . . now I go home after work and
> that's it, unless I am on call, which is about three days per month."
>
> Medical indemnity was also a consideration; for Dr Dennis, it was her
> largest practice expense. In 2002 her premium was about $100,000 and in
> that year she delivered 200 babies. On top of that, she had to buy $50,000
> in tail cover for any future claims when she retired from private
practice.
> "Ultimately you have to put it on the bill to the patients," she said.
>
> Doctors are also warning that the public hospital system will be
> increasingly struggling to meet the demand created by the exodus of
private
> obstetricians.
>
> "If we get another 16,800 babies in the public hospital system, which is
> the amount of births we
> would expect to handle in the next few years, there will be strain," Dr
> Child said.
>
> Specialist obstetricians are also quitting public hospitals. The survey
> found 100 intended to quit the system in the next five years.
>
> Of the 1162 specialists practising obstetrics and gynaecology around the
> country, less than half practise obstetrics and only 300 are in private
> practice only.
>
> Already, 150 specialists have quit private practice in the past three
> years, and 55 said they
> intended to stop private practice in 2003, the survey found. Over the next
> five years, another 150 will cease practice.
>
> While medical indemnity was not nominated as the main reason for leaving
> the profession, 10 per cent of those surveyed reported paying premiums of
> more than $98,000 in 2001-02.
>
> "One issue is the affordability, but there is also the ogre of this
hanging
> around in the background, whatever you do," Dr Child said. Ultimately, it
> meant it was increasingly difficult to get a private practitioner, with
> rural areas suffering most, he said.
> ------------------------------------
>
>
>
> -----
> Andrea Robertson
> Birth International * ACE Graphics * Associates in Childbirth Education
>
> e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> web: www.birthinternational.com
>
>
> --
> This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
> Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe.

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe.

Reply via email to