Sally: I know this is not what we were discussing, but from Andrea's excitement and announcement I erroneously (apparently) assumed this program was starting to be implemented. This is why, when this discussion first started I did ask what protocols were being discussed. To be honest I still don't know.
 
marilyn
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2003 2:57 PM
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] CMP homebirth

The NSWCMP is not what we are discussing. NSWCMP is a model for statewide reform based on NMAP which uses CMP (WA) as a model. We are discussing the implementation of hospital based homebirth services in NSW. If �we� were able to implement the NSWCMMP as proposed by the Maternity Coalition it would be a whole world of good!

 

Love Sally Westbury

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marilyn Kleidon
Sent: Monday, 1 December 2003 9:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] CMP homebirth

 

This is the part of andrea's website (under the features section) that i thought we were discussing:

 

Implementing NSWCMP
A program outline for the implementation of caseload midwifery care in the public health sector.

 

 

if this is not so then, I apologise and retract all previous statements.

 

marilyn

 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Mary Murphy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2003 5:53 AM

Subject: [ozmidwifery] CMP homebirth

 

> Someone commented that the CMP & Albany outcomes could not be compared.  I
> agree, but you should also know that the criteria for acceptance on the CMP
> does NOT exclude VBACs or some other higher risk women.   These women and
> those with complicated pregnancies do not get transferred out of the
> umbrella of the CMP.  The original plan for a homebirth is changed to a
> hospital birth with the CMP midwife continuing to give antenatal care,
> attending the labour and birth (as a birth companion) and continuing to give
> postnatal support while in hospital and care in the home after discharge.
> The main aim under these circumstances is continuity of care and care
> provider.  It is especially valuable for those women who DO have problems.
> These are the women who need to have a trusted care providor.  Under our
> present arrangement we are employed by the Health Dept of W.A and insured
> under the States "Risk Cover".  All W.A. community groups are having their
> funding reviewed and this is an ongoing concern for us. Don't be deceived
> that the "Hospital based homebirth"  programs will have problem free
> administration and funding.  Doctors DO NOT approve of midwifery models of
> care, anywhere, hence the continual interference with the protocols and
> guidelines of Birth Centres and the closing of these centres all over the
> country, regardless of outcomes.  MM
>
>
> --
> This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
> Visit <
http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe.
>

Reply via email to