|
Sue, I take on board all you have said and agree with you on many
points. One thing I am puzzled about is your naming a "smallish
unit" +/-700 per month. That is not really a very people friendly
establishment size, just one which we have come to accept. NMAP, which
personalises the care, could be the answer in any size unit. You say: we do not often have the luxury of getting to know our women very
well before their labour, My point and that of NMAP is, it
shouldn't be a luxury. It should be standard, particularly for
the more needy women. It should also be structured so that it is midwife
friendly. Hospital Teams of 6-8 midwives is too big. The FBC model is
wonderful for the woman, but the staffing method needs to be re- thought.
Caroline Flint's model is ideal. Cheers, MM -----
|
- [ozmidwifery] a labouring woman is a labouring woman??? Susan Cudlipp
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Re:a labouring woman is a labouring ... Mary Murphy
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Re:a labouring woman is a labour... Susan Cudlipp
- Re: [ozmidwifery] a labouring woman is a labouring wom... Justine Caines
