|
MIchelle:
I would urge you to go actually read the case
studies around these maternal mortality stats. The studies are also on the web
site, at least they were because I downloaded them a couple of years ago. What I
found/interpreted were many very ill women with various cardiovascular disorders
plus women with rapidly escalating pre-eclampsi/eclampsia and one immediate
postpartum eclamptic seizure (after an NVB and early d/c). For most of the women
who died it would seem to me that caesarean birth was their only option for
surviving childbirth, in another time they would probably not attempted to
conceive.
In thinking about this I have wondered for a while
how this increasing maternal mortality is related to the increasing c/s
rate, simply because these women were true cases of needing c/s in other words
they were definetly not elective c/s nor did any of the cases represent
unnecessary c/s, at least not to my mind. I now think there is an indirect link.
Perhaps, in the ether of the promotion of the choice and safety of
caesarean birth women who otherwise would have considered themselves too ill to
undergo pregnancy and childbirth consider childbearing a possibility and then it
becomes a probability.
I am sure there are other
possibilities.
marilyn
----- Original Message -----
|
- [ozmidwifery] caesarean section Michelle Windsor
- Re: [ozmidwifery] caesarean section Denise Hynd
- RE: [ozmidwifery] caesarean section Marilyn Kleidon
- RE: [ozmidwifery] caesarean section Sally Westbury
- Re: [ozmidwifery] caesarean section mh
- Re: [ozmidwifery] caesarean section Marilyn Kleidon
