|
Is there anyone in ozmid land who has the full
study:
Vaginal birth after Caesarean section: an Australian multicentre study.
VBAC Study Group.
Appleton B, Targett C, Rasmussen M, Readman E, Sale F, Permezel M. I am tring to determine exactly what ruptures the
researchers refer to...
the abstract reads:
Retrospective
analysis of medical records and individual case review was undertaken at 11
major obstetric hospitals for a 5 year period from July 1992 to June 1997 to
investigate rates of vaginal birth after Caesarean section (VBAC), the
occurrences of uterine rupture, and the outcomes for mother and infant following
rupture. Total deliveries were 234,015, of which 21,452 or 9.2% were associated
with one or more previous Caesarean sections. Within this scar group, 5419
patients or 25.3% were delivered vaginally. There were 62 cases of significant
uterine rupture with no maternal deaths.
I
will never claim to be an expert at critiquing research, so hope that
someone can offer some suggestion. My question is this...it says that
there were 62 ruptures but they dont say exactly which
groups these ruptures occurred in- was it just the women with previous cs
history? Was it just the whole numbers, ie including those without cs
history? As it reads it doesnt really say
specifically.
It also
reads:
In women
attempting vaginal delivery after a previous lower segment Caesarean section,
the uterine rupture rate was estimated at 0.3%, with 0.05%
experiencing a perinatal death and 0.05% requiring a hysterectomy.
What are the
current figures relating to women having cs requiring
hystorectomy??
Can anyone chat
to me about this soon as i am writing a report on a document that will have HUGE
impact on vbac acre here isn SA...and possibly not for the
good!
cheers Jo
Bainbridge
|
- Re: [ozmidwifery] VBAC multi-centred study Dean & Jo
- Re: [ozmidwifery] VBAC multi-centred study Kathy McCarthy-Bushby
- Re: [ozmidwifery] VBAC multi-centred study Dean & Jo
- Re: [ozmidwifery] VBAC multi-centred st... Kathy McCarthy-Bushby
