I was given this link a while ago and found it interesting reading.

>http://www.cordclamping.com/braindamage.htm 

HTH,
Cath Palmer

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tania &
Laurie
Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2004 2:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ozmidwifery] Cord Clamping


Hi Everyone
My name is Tania and I am doing the 3 year Bachelor of Midwifery at Uni
SA. As a component of our research courses, I have chosen to look at the
practice of cord clamping. In particular early vs delayed clamping. In
my search of the literature I found an abundance of articles supporting
delayed clamping for both term and preterm babies for various/numerous
reasons which I won't go in to here at the moment.

I'm wondering if any midwives out there would be willing to post their
views about this issue and their reasons for practicing either early or
delayed cord clamping. I'm particularly interested in whether it is
evidence based, based on tradition or is it protocol for particular
venues?

I have been able to find some studies relating to cord clamping and
would be grateful if anyone out there can point me to any further recent
articles/studies etc.

Thanks for your time
Tania


--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe.

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe.

Reply via email to