|
There is such a wide variation about how
people are trained. I feel pretty lucky to have has midwifery training and then
apprenticed with a group of midwives. I worked for about 18 more months as the
apprentice. This was a fantastic time. One of the women who inspired me (Hi
Annie Pop) told me that the longer I spent working in the hospital the more
fear I would learn. I am eternally grateful t her for encouraging me to move
out of hospitalised birth earlier rather than later! This is one way to blend the
medicalised training with wise woman training. I believe that we need to work more with the
wise women and I am still learning from and in awe of my mentors here in Fremantle
(Hi Theresa and Mary). Homebirth Midwife "It takes courage to remain a true advocate for women, challenging
authority and sacrificing social and professional acceptance. It takes courage
for a woman to choose a caregiver who will truly advocate for and empower
her." -Judy Slome Cohain -----Original
Message----- >>While I do not support the
notion that women desiring vbac are considered high risk or obstetric care, I
do believe that once a decision is made to augment and/or induce a labour then
the obstetrician needs to be consulted referred to and obstetric protocols need
to be followed if the decision is made to augment/induce, even though midwives
are providing the one-to-one care, it is now obstetric care. I think the way midwives are trained
now, they can still be the carer if induction etc was chosen because they are
trained basically as obstetric nurses, not really in the traditional sense of a
midwife. (Throw the flames if you want, but this idea comes from student
midwives themselves.) Though, I would question any midwife
that agreed or suggested medical induction for any woman having a vbac, it
hikes the risk factor up by heaps. A scarred uterus is usually only at
a higher risk of rupture than an unscarred uterus when unnecessary
interventions are performed ie induction. I haven't heard or read of any woman
having a vbac that had a uterine rupture that was labouring completely
naturally, with absolutely no interventions eg. natural or medical inductions,
ve's, ARM etc. I have met one woman that ruptured,
not after a c-section, but her second son was born so quickly and ferociously
she ruptured. Love Abby |
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Home Birth St... Andrea Bilcliff
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Home Birth St... Liz Newnham
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Home Birth St... D & F Gorrel
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Home Birth St... Denise Hynd
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Home Birth St... Justine Caines
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Uniting midwi... Liz Newnham
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Uniting midwi... carole
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Uniting midwi... Liz Newnham
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Students, tra... Liz Newnham
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Re: uterine rupture 1998 Marilyn Kleidon
- RE: [ozmidwifery] Re: uterine rupture 1998 Sally Westbury
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Re: uterine rupture 1998 Abby and Toby
- RE: [ozmidwifery] Re: uterine rupture 1998 axelbys
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Re: uterine rupture 1998 Abby and Toby
- RE: [ozmidwifery] Re: uterine rupture 1998 ljg
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Re: uterine rupture 1998 Abby and Toby
- [ozmidwifery] Catty midwives Trish David
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Catty midwives Abby and Toby
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Catty midwives Trish David
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Catty midwives Abby and Toby
