Hi Kerreen
As per my earlier email I love the idea as being a concrete platform on which to develop policy. I also like the fact that the initiative is woman focussed and not midwife/health professional focussed as once the parameters are set into place, the assessor evaluating the health care facility doesn't have to be a health professional. This helps to keeps the whole thing objective and independent. I think it works pretty well with the Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI). I'd love to see it happen, given the success of the BFHI and think MC would be the best placed to develop it and oversee it.
Helen Cahill
----- Original Message ----- From: "Kerreen Reiger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 2:00 PM
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] Fw:Mother Friendly Childbirth Initiative
Hi all I have talked with Andrea over the years about the idea of Maternity Coalition taking up the Mother-Friendly Childbirth material. I discovered it independently in 1997 or so and we ran an MC workshop using it as a basis. In 1998 we also organised a lunchtime session at the Birth amongst Friends conference in Canberra at which anthropologist Robbie Davis-Floyd talked about the processes of dialogue which finally produced the CIMS (Coalition for improving maternity services)consensus statement that MFCI now is. Robbie had been closely involved in it all along and I have talked with her since then about its limited but important role in the US as a model for hospitals to aspire to.
At that time, '98, though there seemed little interest from midwives, possibly for reasons to do with time and place. Andrea, I think rightly, pointed out to me that the dialogue about desirable goals needed to happen at the Australian level. I think NMAP and midwifery developments have now facilitated that, and I for one (not speaking for MC at all) would like to see us develop a similar 'steps' type program.
What I think MFCI offers is a set of goals clearly spelt out that can be useful in a variety of settings, including private. It is women-focused rather than midwife/professional focused which is both philosophically important but also strategically useful with obs/managers. That it's used elsewhere can also be valuable, but yes, it needs local development.
Who else thinks it useful as a basis and is interested in getting such a process going? Cheers Kerreen
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Denise Hynd Sent: Tuesday, 22 March 2005 8:38 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Fw:Mother Friendly Childbirth Initiative
Dear Andrea
It is on the national agenda for the NMAP document to be updated for example to cover hospital based 1-2-1 midwifery and the ACMI Giudelines for Referral
Denise Hynd
"Let us support one another, not just in philosophy but in action, for the sake of freedom for all women to choose exactly how and by whom, if by anyone, our bodies will be handled."
- Linda Hes
----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrea Robertson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 5:23 PM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Fw:Mother Friendly Childbirth Initiative
MarsdenHi Helen,
We circulated this document at the Future Birth event in 1996 when
Wagner was on the speaking team. It has been adapted in severalcountries
to reflect local conditions, the most recent one that I saw was for Thailand where the Childbirth and Breastfeeding Foundation of Thailand
now).prepared a variation for use in Cambodia, where they were presenting training workshops for maternity professionals (about 18 months ago
the
The original version is specifically designed for the US scene (see
point about circumcision, as an example) and so would need to beadapted
for use in OZ. Personally, I think that the NMAP takes its placehere,
and because this document is aimed at strengthening midwiferypractise, it
tofollows that the resultant care would be more mother friendly.
Cheers
Andrea
At 05:36 PM 20/03/2005, you wrote:Found this online whilst surfing and wondered if Australia is looking
onlyimplement this kind of idea too (or an adaptation of same). I have
veryheard of the WHO/UNICEF Baby friendly Hospital Initiative which is
greatmuch in use in Australia. Can anyone fill me in? It sounds like a
rg/MFCI/steps/idea to me and should give ammunition to those midwives working in hospitals striving to make improvements in their care/minimize interventions. Maybe maternity coalition may be able to formulate something similar or maybe they have already! - if so, excuse my ignorance... Helen Cahill
<http://www.motherfriendly.org/MFCI/steps/>http://www.motherfriendly.o
Mother-Friendly
The Mother-Friendly Childbirth Initiative
Ten Steps of the Mother-Friendly Childbirth Initiative for
Hospitals, Birth Centers, and Home Birth Services
To receive CIMS designation as "mother-friendly," a hospital, <http://www.motherfriendly.org/MFCI/glossary/#BCenter>birth center, or
supporthome birth service must carry out our philosophical principles by fulfilling the Ten Steps of Mother-Friendly Care:
A mother-friendly hospital, birth center, or home birth service: * Offers all birthing mothers: * Unrestricted access to the birth companions of her choice, including fathers, partners, children, family members, and friends; * Unrestricted access to continuous emotional and physical
from a skilled woman-for example, a <http://www.motherfriendly.org/MFCI/glossary/#doula>doula or labor-support professional: * Access to professional midwifery care. (<http://www.motherfriendly.org/MFCI/references/1/>References) * Provides accurate descriptive and statistical information to the
outcomes.(<http://www.motherfriendly.org/MFCI/references/2/>References)public about its practices and procedures for birth care, including measures of interventions and
of* Provides culturally competent care -- that is, care that is sensitive and responsive to the specific beliefs, values, and customs
religion.(<http://www.motherfriendly.org/MFCI/references/3/>References)the mother's ethnicity and
about,* Provides the birthing woman with the freedom to walk, move
and assume the positions of her choice during labor and birth (unless
elevated)restriction is specifically required to correct a complication), and discourages the use of the lithotomy (flat on back with legs
position.(<http://www.motherfriendly.org/MFCI/references/4/>References)
* Has clearly defined policies and procedures for: * collaborating and consulting throughout the perinatal period
originalwith other maternity services, including communicating with the
resources,caregiver when transfer from one birth site to another is necessary; * linking the mother and baby to appropriate community
support.(<http://www.motherfriendly.org/MFCI/references/5/>References)including prenatal and post-discharge follow-up and breastfeeding
rate of* Does not routinely employ practices and procedures that are unsupported by scientific evidence, including but not limited to the following: * shaving; * enemas; * IVs (intravenous drip); * withholding nourishment; * early <http://www.motherfriendly.org/MFCI/glossary/#Rupture>rupture of membranes; * electronic fetal monitoring; Other interventions are limited as follows: * Has an <http://www.motherfriendly.org/MFCI/glossary/#Induction>induction
rate10% or less; * Has an <http://www.motherfriendly.org/MFCI/glossary/#Episiotomy>episiotomy
hospitals,of 20% or less, with a goal of 5% or less; * Has a total cesarean rate of 10% or less in community
moreand 15% or less in tertiary care (high-risk) hospitals; * Has a VBAC (vaginal birth after cesarean) rate of 60% or
orwith a goal of 75% or more.(<http://www.motherfriendly.org/MFCI/references/6/>References) * Educates staff in non-drug methods of pain relief and does not promote the use of analgesic or anesthetic drugs not specifically required to correct a complication. (<http://www.motherfriendly.org/MFCI/references/7/>References) * Encourages all mothers and families, including those with sick
hold,premature newborns or infants with congenital problems, to touch,
theirbreastfeed, and care for their babies to the extent compatible with
conditions.(<http://www.motherfriendly.org/MFCI/references/8/>References )
newborn.(<http://www.motherfriendly.org/MFCI/references/9/>References)* Discourages non-religious circumcision of the
Baby-Friendly* Strives to achieve the WHO-UNICEF "Ten Steps of the
Hospital Initiative" to promote successful breastfeeding: * Have a written breastfeeding policy that is routinely communicated to all health care staff; * Train all health care staff in skills necessary to implement
ofthis policy; * Inform all pregnant women about the benefits and management
birth;breastfeeding; * Help mothers initiate breastfeeding within a half-hour of
lactation* Show mothers how to breast feed and how to maintain
even if they should be separated from their infants; * Give newborn infants no food or drink other than breast milk
unless medically indicated; * Practice rooming in: allow mothers and infants to remain together 24 hours a day; * Encourage breastfeeding on demand; * Give no artificial teat or pacifiers (also called dummies or
soothers) to breastfeeding infants; * Foster the establishment of breastfeeding support groups and
clinics.(References)refer mothers to them on discharge from hospitals or
Education
----- Andrea Robertson Birth International * ACE Graphics * Associates in Childbirth
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: www.birthinternational.com
-- This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics. Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe.
-- This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics. Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe. -- This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics. Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe.
__________ NOD32 1.1032 (20050323) Information __________
This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.nod32.com
-- This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics. Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe.
