the woman had 2 bouts of infection both treated with abs iv she is now
pregnant and looking forward to no complications jan
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "sally" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 3:56 PM
Subject: [ozmidwifery] Re: bathing babies


> Pardon my ignorance, but what would be the risk of infection?
> I think as long as the babe's temp is ok and it hasn't been compromised in
> any way it doesn't really matter. As long as the parents are happy. I
> certainly wouldn't be bathing the baby if the parents were unable to
> participate, at any stage after the birth.
> A bath is a bath, I don't think we need guidelines or a rationale, surely?
> ( I seem to remember posts about this subject earlier in the year, am I
> right?)
>
> Sally
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Nicole Carver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "ozmid" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 1:50 PM
>
>
> > Dear fellow list members,
> >
> > What is your practice regarding the timing of the first bath, in a
> hospital
> > setting? One of my colleagues is re-examining our current practice of
> > delaying the first bath until approx 24hrs, and after babe's temp is
> > confirmed to be normal. We are keen to know the rationale for other
> > midwives' practice, including it's impact on the infant's temperature
and
> > risk of infection.
> >
> > Your input would be most appreciated.
> >
> > Nicole Carver.
> >
> >
> > --
> > This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
> > Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe.
>
>
> --
> This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
> Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe.
>


--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe.

Reply via email to