What needs to be asked here is just how many still
births are we talking about? We
(mainly the doctors) PRIDE ourselves on having one of the lowest perinatal mortality
rates in the world and yet they are happy to suggest inductions at 39 weeks for
women to potentially save a few?
What about the number of babies who suffer fetal distress due to a
failed induction resulting in CS and then the risks associated with that? I
last heard that over 40% of inductions result in CS for failure to progress and
Fetal Distress!! What about the
links of still birth with women who have had previous cs? Are they not just inventing another self
perpetuating cycle that places them (the docs) as the saviours of what is nothing
more than iotragenic (sp?) ‘problems’ anyway. Gr Gr
GR! What
is BP lending his name to????? Ha she
not heard of the dark side!!! How sad
for birthing women. MIDWIVES NEED TO GET IN AND DO
RESEARCH TO COMBAT THIS CRAP! Jo -- |
- [ozmidwifery] 39 week inductions Dean & Jo
- RE: [ozmidwifery] 39 week inductions Lieve Huybrechts
- RE: [ozmidwifery] 39 week inductions Andrea Robertson
- RE: [ozmidwifery] 39 week inductions Joanne & Steve Fisher