|
The endless credentialling and "proving" that midwifery care is safe is
just a trick to keep midwives chasing their tails forever. The real
power for midwives lies in telling the truth "Most women would be
better off with a chimpanzee as caregiver than a physician." Also,
many women give birth just fine all alone and there's very little one
way or another that any person outside of the family does on the day of
the birth to make a baby live or die. The main thing that is offered
by midwives is what they DON'T do---give dangerous pharmaceuticals to
birthing women and their babies. I can never understand why anybody is trying to justify the safety of midwifery care any more. Marjorie Tew of Glasgow, Scotland has done all the research that we ever need to see. What is really superlative about her work is that she was seeking to prove that giving birth in large hospitals was the safest thing. When someone sets out to prove one thing and then becomes a travelling spokesperson for the opposite view, THAT gets my attention. Once she showed statistically, that home or small clinic is the safest place to give birth EVEN FOR VERY HIGH RISK WOMEN, then she turned her attention to "How young of a preemie can safely be born at home?" What she found by using Dutch stats is that down to 32 w.g.a. babies are best born outside of big hospitals. It may be that even younger babies do better at home but there were not sufficient numbers to prove that. Her book "Safer Childbirth?" should be required reading for all those MCP ob/gyns you have in Australia. Gloria Sonja wrote: I don't have a problem with credentialing. What I do have a problem is, what additional, ongoing training or credentialing does an ob have to do. These are the people that save the babies!!!!! Just ask Andrew Pesce and Pieter Mourik!! Sonja ----- Original Message ----- From: "G Lemay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, September 02, 2005 1:26 AM Subject: [ozmidwifery] NSW news |
