Well :), I forwarded all messages from the list from past 3 days to you when you said you weren't getting anything. There were 31 of them. I think you're not getting any messages from the list, I don't know why. The messages you are sending to the list are coming through.
Vedrana -----Original Message----- From: Denise Hynd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 3:36 PM To: Vedrana Valčić Cc: [email protected] Subject: Problems with Ozmid List or not?? Nothing for several days and suddenly 31 from you Vedrana Valčić <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) and nothing from the list not even my question What is happening ?? Denise Hynd "Let us support one another, not just in philosophy but in action, for the sake of freedom for all women to choose exactly how and by whom, if by anyone, our bodies will be handled." - Linda Hes ----- Original Message ----- From: "Vedrana Valčić" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 8:56 PM Subject: FW: [ozmidwifery] IOL and C/s... -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lisa Barrett Sent: Monday, September 12, 2005 3:53 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] IOL and C/s... Hi Tania I too have been checking out the facts on inductions after listening to the same Obstetrician. The Nice guidelines say that the mortality rate is 1 in 3000 at 37 weeks 3 in 3000 at 41 weeks and 6 in 3000 at 43 weeks. at 40wks 58% of women have delivered at 41wks 74% of women have delivered at 42wks 82% of women have delivered. Due to all of the above the conclusion they make is induction prior to 41 wks increases work load without significantly lowering perinatal mortality. The whole document can be read on www.nice.org.uk Also there are some interesting figures on the birthlove site below. These figures do show the risk for primip section is doubled with induction but the over all section rate doesn't seem to be altered. Unless I've misinterpreted it. http://www.birthlove.com/free/induction.html#first Lisa Barrett ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tania Smallwood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, September 12, 2005 8:52 PM Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] IOL and C/s... > Hi Belinda, > > Is this stat published anywhere, or just anecdotal? A 60% section rate is > twice the rate for the state, and I think twice the average for that > hospital too, and having just heard a leading obstetrician there tell > women > that there is NO risk of an increase in c/s as a result of induction, I'm > trying to get my head around it... > > Tania > x > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Belinda > Sent: Tuesday, 13 September 2005 12:06 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] IOL and C/s... > > Tania, at the wch the stats are - for primip women indcued before 41 > weeks there is a 60% cs rate. > Belinda > > Tania Smallwood wrote: > >> >> >> Just wondering if there are any good quality trials about IOL and >> increase of c/s? Have just re-read Enkin, and it does state that IOL >> is not associated with an increase in caesarean section rate (but >> given that most states here are up around the 30% mark, you have to >> wonder what they are comparing that to?), but I thought something came >> out of the Uk not long ago disputing this? >> >> >> >> Anyone? >> >> >> >> Tania >> > -- > This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics. > Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe. > > > > > -- > This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics. > Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe. > -- This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics. Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe. -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.23/99 - Release Date: 12/09/2005 -- This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics. Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe.
