We should have evidence to back up any intervention we offer ie. active
third stage and cutting the cord. It could be argued that a Lotus Birth is
not an intervention, because essentially it involves doing nothing. So, I
guess the onus is on the counter arguement to demonstrate that alternative
interventions improve outcomes.
Rachel
From: "Anne Peter Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: [ozmidwifery] Lotus Birth
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 20:30:14 +1000
There has been discussion on a committee I am involved with regarding the
practice of Lotus Birth and whether women should be "allowed" this, I am
familiar with this practice but a couple of issues were raised :
What evidence is available to support this practice ?
Why do women choose to do this?
Is there an increased risk of infection etc ?
When will the cord/placenta separate?
I believe in informed choice and I am keen to present this in an evidenced
based manner to allow women the choice.I have my own experience and
thoughts but additional research/ evidence would be appreciated.
Many Thanks Anne
Brisbane.
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Messenger 7.5 is now out. Download it for FREE here.
http://messenger.msn.co.uk
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe.
