I have a question for you wise
ozmidders.
I was having a discussion today with one of our
obstetricians regarding cord clamping, and the benefits to the baby of delaying
this until pulsations cease. When I mentioned the benefit of the baby
recieving oxygenated blood via the pulsating cord which could assist it's
transition to independent respiration particularly if it was compromised (etc
etc) the obs was of the view that the pulsations could NOT be providing
oxygenated blood because the uterus would have contracted down and the placenta
could no longer be getting oxygen from mother's circulation.
Now I know that I have read reams on this and this
is stated to be one of the benefits, but I could not answer that particular
question physiologically and convincingly.
The point was also raised that in shoulder
dystocia, babies die of asphyxiation, which (obs opinion) would not happen if
they were recieving oxygen via the cord.
I did print off George Morley's excellent papers
for this Dr to read but would very much welcome anything that can show that the
baby would still be receiving oxygenated blood post birth.
TIA
Sue
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil
is for good men to do nothing"
Edmund Burke |
- [ozmidwifery] question Susan Cudlipp
- Re: [ozmidwifery] question Anne Clarke
- Re: [ozmidwifery] question Susan Cudlipp
- RE: [ozmidwifery] question Tania Smallwood
- RE: [ozmidwifery] question B & G
- Re: [ozmidwifery] question Susan Cudlipp
- RE: [ozmidwifery] question Mary Murphy
- RE: [ozmidwifery] question B & G
- Re: [ozmidwifery] question Justine Caines
- Re: [ozmidwifery] question Helen and Graham
- Re: [ozmidwifery] caseload Helen and Graham