I can vouch for that
Andrea Q
On 12/01/2006, at 7:49 PM, Jo Bourne wrote:
Sally this is a public list with archives publicly available on the
internet. Anyone googling for Epi-no may have stumbled across emails
from this list and sent them on. Quite possibly it is somebody's job
to google for discussions just like this one on a daily or weekly
basis so the company can defend themselves if they want to. There is
no privacy on the internet and it is a mistake to think that there is,
especially in a public forum or mailing list.
At 5:21 PM +1100 12/1/06, Sally-Anne Brown wrote:
Dear all,
RE: Dear Kelly,
I have just been sent the email you sent from your client regarding
EPI-NO.
I have also seen the comment from a midwife who answered your query.
I am very interested to read these posts.
Sent by whom ???
It is clear that irrespective of comments made on this list that any
person forwarding list emails without consent of the persons involved
is (knowlingly or unknowingly) in breach of basic email ethics.
In the extreme of course this may be referred to as a 'mole'.
Can those persons who wish to send on emails please take the time to
ask first ?
and for the person/persons who have sent on these emails, perhaps you
will consider acknowledging this to the list.
Kind Regards
Sally-Anne
----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrea Robertson"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 4:17 PM
Subject: [ozmidwifery] EPI-NO
Hello,
Just forwarding a message I received from Tecsana, that was intended
for the list....
------------
You have not provided sufficient information for a response to this
woman's query however
from what has been provided:
a. The second time she has used EPI-NO
b. She was pushing out the balloon.
the woman was not following instructions in the correct use of
EPI-NO. It would not be
possible to push out the balloon with the amount of dilatation
possible after the second
use. The balloon is inflated to the level of personal comfort and
the woman will experience
a slight burning sensation at which point she would cease
dilatation. This is controlled by
the woman. Your client should not recommence training with EPI-NO
unless instructed to
by her obstetrician as her problem may be the result of an
underlying condition.
Perhaps you could request from the midwife who made that comment,
clinical evidence
to support it. We work in an evidence based medical environment,
and all evidence of
which we are aware supports the contrary view. A new EPI-NO
Clinical Trial will commence
in January through Sydney University to show the effect of EPI-NO on
the Pelvic Floor
following childbirth.
Please make you client aware that EPI-NO is also a pelvic floor
training device which can
be used 4-6 weeks after delivery to strengthen the Pelvic Floor.
I would be happy to answer any questions you may have.
Sincerely
Campbell Heather
Tecsana Limited.
-----
Andrea Robertson
Birth International * ACE Graphics * Associates in Childbirth
Education
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: www.birthinternational.com
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe.
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.17/227 - Release Date:
11/01/2006
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.17/227 - Release Date:
11/01/2006
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe.
--
Jo Bourne
Virtual Artists Pty Ltd
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe.
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe.
