|
What I cannot understand here is that the woman was
transferred at 23.45hours for mec liquor, and "sat on" for the next 5 hours,
presumably being monitored by CTG all that time with the mec getting
thicker.
How come the midwives are copping the blame
here? The attending midwife obviously transferred appropriately, it would
appear to be hospital mis-management, either lack of monitoring, inexperience in
reading the monitor, or lack of appropriate assessment by doctor on
duty.
Either way, to allow a woman to labour with fetal
distress which must have been increasing for the babe to be so compromised is
certainly unforgiveable - but why was she left so long? That is the
question that needs to be answered. Even in hospital care the doctor was
'too busy' to assess this poor woman?
Tragic.
Sue
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do
nothing"
Edmund Burke
| ||||||||||||||||
Title: Message
- Re: [ozmidwifery] But there is Dr delay to the ... Susan Cudlipp
- Re: [ozmidwifery] But there is Dr delay to... Mike & Lindsay Kennedy
