Do you really think that a massive PPH 2.5 weeks (WEEKS, not hours or days) after a ceaser that resulted in a nasty uterine infection is most likely to do with the breech presentation? If the babe was cephalic she still might have stuck at full dilation and had a c/s - would she have been less likely to have gotten an infection or have the PPH?
At 6:21 PM +0800 2/4/06, Mary Murphy wrote: >I guess this is why some advise c/s for breech, but it seems that this, ³She >laboured to fully without any analgesia then >pushed valiantly for 3.5 hrs² is the problem. I was led to believe that if >progress of the breech halted, then it was the time to change options. Mm -- Jo Bourne Virtual Artists Pty Ltd -- This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics. Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe.
