As far as I am award it IS the capture theory. Stick thousands of babies with Hep B vax to maybe save one. For those who do consent at our hospital we give on the day of the Neonatal screening. One of our midwives has looked into the perinatal data in Qld and found that there were not figures for babies who missed the birth dose and caught Hep B in the first few months. We work on the premise that if it says on the hospital supplied literature that babies may feel unwell and need extra fluids after an immunisation, why are we doing that before they even know how to suckle properly? Birth dose is classified as given in the first week. The pressure to give 'at birth', before the poor kid has had time to even draw breath properly, is so they don't get lost in the system. With midwifery clinics we are aware of women who live high risk lifestyles and are at risk of defaulting when it may not be best to do so and we just make sure that it is done before they go home if it is before the neonatal screening. Cheers Judy --- Justine Caines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Mary and Amanda > > Exactly Mary! > > Amanda have you read Sara Wickham's work on Vit K? > > What is the consent process for Hep B, Are parents aware of > the specific > populations of risk? > > I must say the Hep B at birth really shocks me. What are the > risk factors > for babies who are not in contact with those in high risk > groups such as > those already infected or sex workers and intravenous drug > users? > > It seems like a capture theory to me and I worry about the > level of informed > consent. > > JC > > > -- > This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics. > Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or > unsubscribe. > Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com -- This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics. Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe.
