Dear all
In the West Australian Saturday edition was a short
piece about the Qld government apologising and 'promising to improve its health
services' following a woman delivering a 34 week stillborn baby en route
to Rockhampton hosp on May 16th.
The main points reported were:
This sounds soooo crazy! Why could she not be
cared for at Emerald hosp by the "midwife and obstetrician" who saw
her there?
Why was she sent on a 3 hour drive away from her
family at such a traumatic time?
Why did an obstetrician feel
unable to deliver a breech despite the fact that it was a 34 week baby who had
very sadly died prior to labour - surely the medical reasoning for NOT
doing a vaginal breech birth is supposed to be about the
baby's safety???? Or are they all now so fearful of babies coming bum
first that they will not even allow a stillborn baby to arrive that
way.
According to the West the concern is about whether
or not she should have been sent by ambulance. My concern is why it was
deemed necessary to send this poor couple ANYWHERE in these
circumstances.
Can anyone shed some light on this? Following
the "Bringing Birth back Home" theme of the weekend this story really saddened
me.
Sue
|
- [ozmidwifery] roadside birth Susan Cudlipp
- RE: [ozmidwifery] roadside birth B & G
- Re: [ozmidwifery] roadside birth Susan Cudlipp
- RE: [ozmidwifery] roadside birth Lisa Gierke