Thanks everyone for your input; it made some good Monday morning reading :-)


Sezai Komur wrote:
> I've seen quite a lot of SBS Server + DC + Exchange + WSS 3.0 with 
> http://companyweb deployed in the SMB market :( they then want to 
> scale out to support more content and users, oh the pain. DC + 
> SharePoint in prod makes administering SharePoint tougher than usual.
>
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Michael Nemtsev <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>     I didn't have a lot issues with SP on DC server. Maybe SP2 did
>     work quite
>     well.
>     But definitely SP should be off the DC Server
>
>     WBR,
>     Michael Nemtsev, Microsoft MVP
>
>     http://www.sharepoint-sandbox.com
>     http://msmvps.com/blogs/laflour
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>     From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     [mailto:[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf
>     Of Paul Culmsee
>     Sent: Friday, 5 February 2010 7:15 PM
>     To: 'ozMOSS'
>     Subject: RE: The SharePoint + Domain Controller situation
>
>     I had a client who had SharePoint on a prod DC and I had to go
>     through the
>     process of getting it off. This old post has some nuggets from the
>     experience and perhaps offers some insights into problems it can
>     cause.
>
>     Despite the post being about a prod install, it's probably handy
>     info to
>     know...
>
>     
> http://www.cleverworkarounds.com/2008/09/16/sometimes-microsoft-bashing-is-j
>     ustified/
>     
> <http://www.cleverworkarounds.com/2008/09/16/sometimes-microsoft-bashing-is-j%0Austified/>
>
>
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>     From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     [mailto:[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf
>     Of Michael Nemtsev
>     Sent: Friday, 5 February 2010 4:06 PM
>     To: 'ozMOSS'
>     Subject: RE: The SharePoint + Domain Controller situation
>
>     There is nothing bad, except that DC role turns off HDD caching to
>     protect
>     AD data.
>     It leads to the performance degradation to work with the HDD.
>     It's not an issue for the SharePoint because it's not drive
>     intensive system
>     and it uses SQL server (RAM) most of the time
>
>     The bad situation is when you consider using DC + SharePoint on
>     development
>     station (VS and other tools) - performance degrade is very visible
>     in this
>     case
>
>
>     WBR,
>     Michael Nemtsev, Microsoft MVP
>
>     http://www.sharepoint-sandbox.com
>     http://msmvps.com/blogs/laflour
>
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>     From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     [mailto:[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf
>     Of Joseph Clark
>     Sent: Friday, 5 February 2010 4:40 PM
>     To: ozMOSS
>     Subject: The SharePoint + Domain Controller situation
>
>     Hi List!
>
>     As a fairly new SharePoint developer, I've seen anecdotal
>     references all
>     over the Internet about how installing SharePoint and the Domain
>     Controller server role on the same server is a one-way ticket to
>     disaster town.
>
>     What I am yet to discover is *why* this is bad? What problems does
>     it cause?
>
>     I'm trying to setup some nice clean virtual machine images for my
>     development environment and was wondering what's the ideal setup?
>     Should I run my dev environment SharePoint server just using local
>     accounts? Is it OK to have the DC on the same computer in a controlled
>     development environment? Should I run an additional virtual machine to
>     act as the domain controller?
>
>     All advice/suggestions appreciated :-)
>
>     Cheers,
>     Joe.
>
>
>     --
>     Register now for Atlassian Summit 2010, June 9-11
>     http://summit.atlassian.com
>
>     Joseph Clark
>     .NET Developer
>
>     Atlassian
>     +61 422 812 044 mobile
>     173-185 Sussex St.
>     Sydney, NSW
>     Australia
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     ozmoss mailing list
>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     ozmoss mailing list
>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     ozmoss mailing list
>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     ozmoss mailing list
>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> ozmoss mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
>   
_______________________________________________
ozmoss mailing list
[email protected]
http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss

Reply via email to