We used this approach in one of our sharepoint internet projects for core.js

http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ecm/archive/2007/02/21/building-a-new-page-layout-which-does-not-reference-core-js-but-downloads-it-while-the-page-is-being-viewed-thereby-optimizing-response-time.aspx


On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Paul Noone <
paul.no...@ceosyd.catholic.edu.au> wrote:

>  Yeah, core.js is there to stay for the time being I think.
>
>
>
> The search indexing started working some time Friday night. Not sure if
> there was just a delay with cached DNS or it was due to something I did.
>
>
>
> What was odd was that during this time I also had the problem with
> uploaded/modified files not getting changes. In effect, Edit or Upload and
> replace file then checking in resulted in no changes. Version number and
> modification date remained the same. I repeated this three or four times
> just to make sure I wasn’t going nuts.
>
>
>
> This is also resolved thank Jed. Maybe site collection caching? Anyway, all
> good now.
>
>
>
> Thanks for the feedback. It’s a work in progress but I’m very happy with my
> efforts so far.
>
>
>
> *From:* ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Sezai Komur
> *Sent:* Friday, 22 October 2010 4:14 PM
> *To:* ozMOSS
> *Subject:* Re: New site launch
>
>
>
> If you remove core.js. The search button click won't work, note if you
> mouse over the button it displays *javascript:S78D07080_Submit() *which is
> dependent on core.js
>
>
>
> You're also exposing list forms and other backend /_layouts/*.aspx pages in
> this site, the bulk of these also rely on core.js for functioning.
>
>
>
> Now if you weren't using list forms (by enabling ViewFormPagesLockdown),
> and if you developed your own search box and button control you could
> probably remove core.js, although as it stands now users need core.js to use
> your site.
>
>
>
> For your search crawling issue, if you log into the server that doing the
> indexing, open up IE and you try and browse to your site, you can tell if
> the server is able to get to the new site, if it still loads the old site,
> or if it fails to load at all (loopback fix?) then you know that the search
> crawler won't be able to get to your site either.
>
>
>
> Sezai.
>
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Paul Noone <
> paul.no...@ceosyd.catholic.edu.au> wrote:
>
> Yeah, I agree. Especially with the addition of the jQuery and associated
> plugins.
>
>
>
> At the moment we’re only running a single masterpage. Is the simplest fix
> to create another one without <SharePoint:ScriptLink name="init.js" defer
> ="true" runat="server"/> and use that as the custom master?
>
>
>
> Also, for some daft reason the search service is still trying to index the
> old site which used the same host header. I’ve dumped the index and run a
> few full crawls with no success. Something appears to be cached somewhere.
>
>
>
> Any ideas? Do I need to restart the search service or something?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Paul
>
>
>
> --
>
> Online Developer/Administrator,
> ICT Projects Team
> *CEO Sydney*
>
>
>
> *From:* ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Tommy Segoro
> *Sent:* Friday, 22 October 2010 3:54 PM
> *To:* ozMOSS
> *Subject:* RE: New site launch
>
>
>
> Mate,
>
>
>
> Looks really good. Well done.
>
>
>
> One suggestion: Initially the site loads at ~800kb (which can be quiet slow
> for slower internet connection). The main reason for this is the core.js
> (and other javascripts) that is loaded. If public users don’t need to see
> SP-related javascript functionalities (e.g. site actions) you can probably
> hide this from public view.
>
>
>
>
>
> The script is obviously cached after that and the page size is down to
> ~120-150kb.
>
>
>
>
>
> Other than that looks really good. Well done.
>
>
>
>
>
> *Tommy Segoro*
>
> Solutions Architect and Practice Lead
>
> [image: cid:image001.png@01CAC5C2.CA4CD280]
>
> L7 Solutions Pty Ltd
> www.L7.com.au
>
> 2005 Aust/NZ *"Cisco Partner of the Year"*
>
> 2006 WA Business News* *Rising Star - *5th Fastest growing WA private
> company*
>
> 2008 BRW Fast 100 - *18th Fastest growing company in Australia”*
>
> 2009 CRN Fast 50 - *27th Fastest growing IT Reseller in Australia*
>
> 2010 MSP Mentor Top 100 - “*Globally the 27th  fastest growing Managed
> Service Partner”*
>
>
> T: +61 8 9221 7744
> F: +61 8 9221 8199
>
> M: +61 404 457 754
> Level 14 256 Adelaide Terrace Perth WA 6000
> PO Box 3044 Adelaide Terrace WA 6832
>
>
>
> *From:* ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Paul Noone
> *Sent:* Friday, 22 October 2010 11:27 AM
> *To:* ozMOSS
> *Subject:* New site launch
>
>
>
> Hi guys,
>
>
>
> It’s been a long time coming but with great trepidation I am finally proud
> to announce the launch of our new Internet site running on MOSS 2007.
>
>
>
> Please give it a look-see when you have time. Any feedback would be most
> welcome as UAT was mostly restricted to non-techies.
>
>
>
> www.ceosyd.catholic.edu.au
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Paul Noone
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Online Developer/Administrator
>
> Information Communication and Technology
> Catholic Education Office, Sydney
> p: (02) 9568 8461
>
> f: (02) 9568 8483
> e: paul.no...@ceosyd.catholic.edu.au
> w: http://www.ceosyd.catholic.edu.au/
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ozmoss mailing list
> ozmoss@ozmoss.com
> http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ozmoss mailing list
> ozmoss@ozmoss.com
> http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
>
>

<<image001.png>>

<<image002.png>>

_______________________________________________
ozmoss mailing list
ozmoss@ozmoss.com
http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss

Reply via email to