Thanks Ivan. I agree.

We manually deploy all updates regardless but that WSS 2 update has got me
worried. It dates back to 2008. Surely it's redundant/superseded?

Anyone else receive it?

On 19 September 2012 12:15, Ivan Wilson <[email protected]> wrote:

>  Windows Updates – I suggest accepting these and deploying automatically
> to all servers****
>
> WSS Updates – I would recommend manually deploying and testing these in
> dev and then rolling out to prod. WSS Service Packs are rare****
>
> ** **
>
> Ivan****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On
> Behalf Of *Web Admin
> *Sent:* Wednesday, 19 September 2012 11:58 AM
> *To:* ozMOSS
> *Subject:* [SP2010] Windows Updates and WSS****
>
> ** **
>
> Hi all,****
>
> ** **
>
> I have a question around the approval of WSS updates from our WSUS server.
> The server admin wants to know whether to include these.****
>
> ** **
>
> My feeling is yes but my concern is with someone installing these as part
> of a usual maintenance/security update.****
>
> ** **
>
> What are other people doing? What caught my attention was the WSS 2 update
> that he included below.****
>
> ** **
>
> Windows SharePoint Services 2.0 Service Pack 3 (KB923643) --  *Last
> Review: February 18, 2008*****
>
> Windows SharePoint Services 3.0 Service Pack 2 (KB953338)****
>
> ** **
>
> Regards,****
>
> ** **
>
> Paul****
>
> _______________________________________________
> ozmoss mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
>
>


-- 
Regards,

Paul Noone

SharePoint Farm Admin/Developer
Infrastructure Team
CEO Sydney

p: (02) 9568 8461
f: (02) 9568 8483
e: [email protected]
w: http://www.ceosyd.catholic.edu.au/
_______________________________________________
ozmoss mailing list
[email protected]
http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss

Reply via email to