If it doesn't need a lot of features perhaps use 365 for the public facing
site, it does have some limitations but fine for static content and a lot
cheaper than a FIS license for SharePoint on prem.
From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of
Ajay
Sent: Friday, 26 April 2013 8:49 AM
To: ozMOSS
Subject: Re: Website and intranet on same farm
Hi Ivan,
Thanks for your input, the client is quite paranoid, and will be going with
separate farm for website.
Cheers
A
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Ivan Wilson
<iv...@sharepointgurus.net<mailto:iv...@sharepointgurus.net>> wrote:
Security will be a concern. By having a public site on the same farm as
internal content means you are more at risk of the internal content becoming
accessible externally. With separate farms, you can more easily isolate the
servers.
It is possible to have separate web apps on the same farm that don't share any
information, however it is also easy to accidently expose information,
particularly through service applications like search.
Having a dedicated farm for a public site is not cheap though, so I think the
decision should be based on the risk of exposing internal data (either
accidently or via hacking). If the consequence of a leak is not serious and the
SharePoint admins can be trusted to configure appropriately, then go for it.
Picking the right level of paranoia to have regarding security is tough. Just
remember, if you don't think they are watching you, they are.
Ivan
From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com<mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com>
[mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com<mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com>] On Behalf
Of Ajay
Sent: Tuesday, 16 April 2013 12:29 PM
To: ozMOSS
Subject: Website and intranet on same farm
Hi Guys,
SharePoint 2013 solution starting with website, later intranet for
collaboration and subsequently BI services and possibly extranet.
The web site is mostly static and has few hundred visitors each day.
Intranet users will be around 500.
We are thinking to have website and intranet/extranet on same server farm.
Is it okay to have website and intranet on the same farm.. any pitfalls or
pointers suggestions
Next question
As per example farm topologies in the MS topology guide
http://zoom.it/AgjL#full ,, for less than 1000 users -
2 load balanced servers, which will have all the services running and database
server should be fine.
Concurrent users will be about 100
Do you think this is okay or is any good reason to add App Server in the mix,
the website is fairly low usage and will likely remain so...
_______________________________________________
ozmoss mailing list
ozmoss@ozmoss.com<mailto:ozmoss@ozmoss.com>
http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
___________________________________________________
This message is intended only for the use of the addressee.
This email and any attachments are confidential and may
contain legally privileged information or copyright material.
If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use or
dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you received
this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by telephone on +61 8 8338
2833 or by return email and delete the original message. It is important to
check for viruses and defects before opening or using attachments. Beach Energy
Limited accepts no liability for any damage caused by this email or its
attachments due to viruses, interference, interception, corruption or
unauthorised access. Thank you.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
_______________________________________________
ozmoss mailing list
ozmoss@ozmoss.com
http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
