> I propose to use a name-convention for all of the feature branches: > > HDDS-XXX-lower-case-name > > For example: > > * HDDS-2665-ofs
+1 If others are ok, I will rename the existing feature branches HDDS-2823 to HDDS-2823-scm-ha HDDS-3001 to HDDS-3001-nfs HDDS-1564 to HDDS-1564-multi-raft HDDS-1880-Decom to HDDS-1880-decom > On 08-Jun-2020, at 7:30 PM, Elek, Marton <e...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Thanks to work on this Nanda. > >> *Do we still need the following branches?* >> HDDS-3710 >> master-stable >> acceptance-coverage >> debug-acceptance-timeout >> integration-test-cleanup > > They can be deleted, AFAIK. acceptance-coverage can be needed to test the > coverage measurement of acceptance tests. But I can recreate if needed (and > will delete after the usage, I promise ;-) ) > > > BTW: > > I propose to use a name-convention for all of the feature branches: > > HDDS-XXX-lower-case-name > > For example: > > * HDDS-2665-ofs > > > using a postfix for long-live, feature branches can help to identify them. > > What do you think? > > Thanks, > Marton > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: ozone-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: ozone-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: ozone-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: ozone-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org
