[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-3802?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Shashikant Banerjee resolved HDDS-3802.
---------------------------------------
    Fix Version/s: 0.6.0
       Resolution: Fixed

> Incorrect data returned by reading a FILE_PER_CHUNK block
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDDS-3802
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-3802
>             Project: Hadoop Distributed Data Store
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Sammi Chen
>            Assignee: Sammi Chen
>            Priority: Critical
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>             Fix For: 0.6.0
>
>
> A summary of s3 big file download result with Apri 22th master branch code,
> 1. download with aws s3 sdk, md5 sum is different
> 2. download with "ozone fs -get o3fs://",  md5 sum is different
> 3. download with "ozone sh key get", md5 sum is the same as the local file
> So it seems the issue is from the read part.  And the md5sum result of step 
> 1. and step 2. are also different from each other. (edited) 
> The difference behaviors are caused by different read buffer size of 
> different interface. If the read buffer size equals to chunk size, then fine. 
> If the read buffer size is smaller than chunk size, then content returned is 
> incorrent, because datanode side read ignore the offset in request, use 0 as 
> offset to read the data.
> FilePerChunkStrategy#readChunk 
> {code:java}
> // use offset only if file written by old datanode
>         long offset;
>         if (file.exists() && file.length() == info.getOffset() + len) {
>           offset = info.getOffset();
>         } else {
>           offset = 0;   ---> this line causes the trouble. 
>         }
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to