captainzmc commented on a change in pull request #1150:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/pull/1150#discussion_r452634999



##########
File path: 
hadoop-ozone/ozone-manager/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/ozone/om/response/key/OMKeysRenameResponse.java
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ * <p>
+ * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ * <p>
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+
+package org.apache.hadoop.ozone.om.response.key;
+
+import com.google.common.annotations.VisibleForTesting;
+import com.google.common.base.Optional;
+import org.apache.hadoop.hdds.utils.db.BatchOperation;
+import org.apache.hadoop.hdds.utils.db.Table;
+import org.apache.hadoop.hdds.utils.db.cache.CacheKey;
+import org.apache.hadoop.hdds.utils.db.cache.CacheValue;
+import org.apache.hadoop.ozone.om.OMMetadataManager;
+import org.apache.hadoop.ozone.om.OmRenameKeyInfo;
+import org.apache.hadoop.ozone.om.helpers.OmKeyInfo;
+import org.apache.hadoop.ozone.om.response.CleanupTableInfo;
+import org.apache.hadoop.ozone.om.response.OMClientResponse;
+import 
org.apache.hadoop.ozone.protocol.proto.OzoneManagerProtocolProtos.OMResponse;
+
+import javax.annotation.Nonnull;
+import java.io.IOException;
+import java.util.List;
+
+import static org.apache.hadoop.ozone.om.OmMetadataManagerImpl.KEY_TABLE;
+import static 
org.apache.hadoop.ozone.om.lock.OzoneManagerLock.Resource.BUCKET_LOCK;
+
+/**
+ * Response for RenameKeys request.
+ */
+@CleanupTableInfo(cleanupTables = {KEY_TABLE})
+public class OMKeysRenameResponse extends OMClientResponse {
+
+  private List<OmRenameKeyInfo> renameKeyInfoList;
+  private long trxnLogIndex;
+  private String fromKeyName = null;
+  private String toKeyName = null;
+
+  public OMKeysRenameResponse(@Nonnull OMResponse omResponse,
+                              List<OmRenameKeyInfo> renameKeyInfoList,
+                              long trxnLogIndex) {
+    super(omResponse);
+    this.renameKeyInfoList = renameKeyInfoList;
+    this.trxnLogIndex = trxnLogIndex;
+  }
+
+
+  /**
+   * For when the request is not successful or it is a replay transaction.
+   * For a successful request, the other constructor should be used.
+   */
+  public OMKeysRenameResponse(@Nonnull OMResponse omResponse) {
+    super(omResponse);
+    checkStatusNotOK();
+  }
+
+  @Override
+  public void addToDBBatch(OMMetadataManager omMetadataManager,
+                           BatchOperation batchOperation) throws IOException {
+    boolean acquiredLock = false;
+    for (OmRenameKeyInfo omRenameKeyInfo : renameKeyInfoList) {
+      String volumeName = omRenameKeyInfo.getNewKeyInfo().getVolumeName();
+      String bucketName = omRenameKeyInfo.getNewKeyInfo().getBucketName();
+      fromKeyName = omRenameKeyInfo.getFromKeyName();
+      OmKeyInfo newKeyInfo = omRenameKeyInfo.getNewKeyInfo();
+      toKeyName = newKeyInfo.getKeyName();
+      Table<String, OmKeyInfo> keyTable = omMetadataManager
+          .getKeyTable();
+      try {
+        acquiredLock =
+            omMetadataManager.getLock().acquireWriteLock(BUCKET_LOCK,
+                volumeName, bucketName);
+        // If toKeyName is null, then we need to only delete the fromKeyName
+        // from KeyTable. This is the case of replay where toKey exists but
+        // fromKey has not been deleted.
+        if (deleteFromKeyOnly()) {

Review comment:
       Thanks Bharat for the suggestion, I have taken a close look at the 
implementation of #1169 with some very nice changes. In this PR I will 
synchronize the #1169 changes here to make sure they are implemented the same.




----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to