Ack... If those are def 4 different domains (sources) then it def sounds like a 
Silverlight networking stack issue. I'll double check that after I get to the 
office.

I'm not aware of any similiar restrictions that the browserwould put on the 
plug in. Someone on the list might know differently (if it's a browser issue vs 
the plug in)?  Have you tried this in other browsers? FF/Chrome?

Caleb Jenkins

[email protected]
m: 469.867.4552 | b: developingUX.com

[*] Improving - It's what we do!
(send from Windows Mobile 6)

-----Original Message-----
From: John OBrien <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 6:41 AM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Silverlight limited to 2 simultaneous connections?


I think you may be onto something Jordan. The application that has brought
this to my attention is not server restricted but I appreciate your comments
Caleb, they are great general suggestions but it seems that Silverlight is
ignoring them.
Take a look at:
http://soulsolutions.com.au/silverlight/blacklight/

It is rendering 6 Bing map controls inside a single Silverlight application.
The tiles are coming from 4 different domains and yet only two request at a
time are coming from Silverlight. I'm using IE8.

The performance is horrible, you have to wait for each DeepZoom image to
complete before the next one starts. Fiddler confirms sets of 2 requests.


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jordan Knight
Sent: Monday, 22 June 2009 9:22 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Silverlight limited to 2 simultaneous connections?

I'd have thought it would be a lowest common denominator problem myself...
the crappest browser can do 2 at once so thats what Silverlight supports to
maintain the best compat?

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Caleb Jenkins
Sent: Monday, 22 June 2009 9:13 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Silverlight limited to 2 simultaneous connections?

John - generally that's a server restriction, and something that has been
well documented on for IIS as well as various strategies in the HTML
communities have been developed to help "get around" this.

For IIS its important when you are using IIS as an application / middle teir
/ wcf server with an IIS front end web server. In that scenario you still
want the limitation from the front end server to the clients, but you want
to increase the allowed cnnection from the app server to the UI server.

The more general html/web strategies involve breaking you resources in to
various sub domains/servers. Images.domain /css/js/html can be placed on
various "domains" to increase your simultanious connections from 2 to 8. The
other strategy is to increase individual payloads and decrease number of
requests. This plays out by combining multiple images on to a single image
and the using css and css "sprite" support to slice and lay out the images
client side. Take a look at the bing.com home page for an exaple of that.
The "blurry" boxes are actually attached to the main image.

Hope that helps! (I'm going to blame all typo's on my phone's "intelli-type"
and the complete lack of a spell check :)

Caleb Jenkins

[email protected]
m: 469.867.4552 | b: developingUX.com

[*] Improving - It's what we do!
(send from Windows Mobile 6)


________________________________
From: John OBrien <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 2:16 AM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Silverlight limited to 2 simultaneous connections?

Anyone know why Silverlight2 seems to be restricted to 2 simultaneous
requests only?
I have changed the browser settings to allow 8, put in 4 different domains
to allow for 8 and even used firefox that supports 8 natively with no luck.

Is there a configuration somewhere at the plugin level to change this?
________________________________
Support procedure: https://www.codify.com/lists/support
List address:
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subscribe:
[email protected]<mailto:ozsilverlight-subscr...@ozs
ilverlight.com>
Unsubscribe:
[email protected]<mailto:ozsilverlight-unsubscribe
@ozsilverlight.com>
List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozsilverlight
Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Support procedure: https://www.codify.com/lists/support
List address: [email protected]
Subscribe: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: [email protected]
List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozsilverlight
Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Support procedure: https://www.codify.com/lists/support
List address: [email protected]
Subscribe: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: [email protected]
List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozsilverlight
Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Support procedure: https://www.codify.com/lists/support
List address: [email protected]
Subscribe: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: [email protected]
List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozsilverlight
Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Support procedure: https://www.codify.com/lists/support
List address: [email protected]
Subscribe: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: [email protected]
List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozsilverlight
Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists

Reply via email to