typically WPF. for the simplest thing you need a 100 LOC viewmodel, a bunch
of XAML bindings. work around one or more bugs with the framework and
(often but not in this case) create a bunch of valueconverters. - and of
course you can also do it in three other ways each of which have different
advantages/drawbacks

makes you wonder how much time databinding really saves when you can hardly
bind to anything but a specifically created viewmodel anyway.
#grumpydeveloper

On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Grant Molloy <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> Oops.. typo..
>
> www.abhisheksur.com/2011/03/issue-with-radiobuttons-and-binding-for.html
> On 24/11/2011 4:03 PM, "Kirsten Greed" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>  Thanks Grant****
>>
>> However the link seems not to work****
>>
>> Am I missing something?****
>>
>>  ****
>>   ------------------------------
>>
>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
>> *On Behalf Of *Grant Molloy
>> *Sent:* Thursday, 24 November 2011 4:58 PM
>> *To:* ozWPF
>> *Subject:* RE: Getting up to speed in wpf****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> This example shows full xaml file, which may assist..
>> www.abhishesur.com/2011/03/issue-with-radiobuttons-and-binding-for.html**
>> **
>>
>> On 24/11/2011 3:54 PM, "Grant Molloy" <[email protected]> wrote:****
>>
>> Agree that partial samples don't help that much!****
>>
>> I think it can be anywhere, but you need to bring it into scope by
>> including it in your xaml file..  that's what the resource declaration is
>> doing.****
>>
>> On 24/11/2011 3:44 PM, "Kirsten Greed" <[email protected]> wrote:**
>> **
>>
>> I had been looking at that tutorial – but I couldn’t figure out where he
>> wants me to put EnumMatchToBooleanConverter  it doesn’t seem to find it in
>> the code behind class****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>>  ****
>>   ------------------------------
>>
>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
>> *On Behalf Of *Grant Molloy
>> *Sent:* Thursday, 24 November 2011 4:34 PM
>> *To:* ozWPF
>> *Subject:* RE: Getting up to speed in wpf****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> Www.wpftutorial.net/RadioButton.html****
>>
>> On 24/11/2011 3:31 PM, "Kirsten Greed" <[email protected]> wrote:**
>> **
>>
>> Yes but how about binding data to radio buttons?****
>>
>>  ****
>>   ------------------------------
>>
>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
>> *On Behalf Of *Scott Barnes
>> *Sent:* Thursday, 24 November 2011 3:41 PM
>> *To:* ozWPF
>> *Subject:* Re: Getting up to speed in wpf****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> That and in WPF you can put pink/yellow rainbow gradients everywhere...**
>> **
>>
>>  ****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> Why are you looking at me like that... don't judge me.****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>>
>> ---
>> Regards,
>> Scott Barnes
>> http://www.riagenic.com****
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Grant Molloy <[email protected]>
>> wrote:****
>>
>> Patrick,
>> Do you honestly believe that data centric app are better in winforms?
>> I would much rather use wpf for data centric app over winforms. The
>> binding model in wpf is very strong and, I think, makes life easier.****
>>
>> On 24/11/2011 2:29 PM, "Patrick Klug" <[email protected]> wrote:****
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ozwpf mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozwpf****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ozwpf mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozwpf****
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ozwpf mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozwpf****
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ozwpf mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozwpf
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> ozwpf mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozwpf
>
>
_______________________________________________
ozwpf mailing list
[email protected]
http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozwpf

Reply via email to