Daniel, based on the experiments we had conducted two summers ago, I have suggested Katya to look at trimming SAT4J. We could probably save around 200k.
On 2010-11-08, at 3:24 PM, Daniel Le Berre wrote: > Hi Katia, > > That's very interesting. > > Could you provide us some hints about the way you achieved that reduction? > > Which parts of p2 did you remove? > > Cheers, > > Daniel > > Le 08/11/2010 21:08, Todorova, Katya a écrit : >> >> Hi, >> >> SAP is currently exploring new spaces, tightly coupled with OSGi Core and >> Enterprise specifications. In the course of that we are looking for a >> suitable provisioning >> technology to manage the lifecycle of a number of OSGi-based components. >> Naturally, p2 looks like a good candidate for that. >> >> The current size of p2 does not meet our constraints and requirements for >> installing our products on all server nodes in large landscapes. >> The provisioning with the product definition should be downloaded fast, with >> minimal network traffic, requiring minimal disk space. We are looking for a >> solution >> where the installer is relatively small compared to the actual product. >> >> So we started looking for ways to use only parts of the already existing >> functionality, while keeping p2 stable and reliable. >> We managed to reach close to our desired target and currently p2 is widely >> used internally by SAP Java Server team. >> >> We are committed to use standard technologies and not fork already existing >> and proven open source projects. Therefore, we are looking forward to >> contributing >> all changes back to the p2 project and evolve it even further. >> >> Our engagement with p2 is increasing and we will definitely need your help >> and guidance in this journey. >> >> Kind regards, >> Katya >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On >> Behalf Of Pascal Rapicault >> Sent: Sunday, November 07, 2010 5:53 AM >> To: P2 developer discussions >> Subject: [p2-dev] SAP Contribution >> >> Hi, >> >> As you may remember, during the summer, members of the SAP Java Server team >> expressed their desire of using p2 under tight size constraints [1]. >> Despite their patches, we have not been really welcoming. This week spent at >> Eclipse Summit, I have had the opportunity to address that by meeting with >> several members of their team and hear them re-express their desire to >> become contributors to p2. >> Though their needs and constraints are slightly different than those we have >> in Eclipse and Equinox, meeting these will help us reach the wider audience >> we had always foreseen for p2. >> >> All that to say that they will be more active and will need our help and >> guidance. >> >> PaScaL >> >> [1] http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/p2-dev/msg03271.html >> _______________________________________________ >> p2-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/p2-dev >> _______________________________________________ >> p2-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/p2-dev >> >> > > > -- > Daniel Le Berre mailto:[email protected] > MCF, CRIL-CNRS UMR 8188, Universite d'Artois > http://www.cril.univ-artois.fr/~leberre > _______________________________________________ > p2-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/p2-dev _______________________________________________ p2-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/p2-dev
