A p2 experience reports session would be interesting IMHO. It would also be useful to the p2 team to see how people are consuming and what they are doing.
Jeff On 2010-11-11, at 4:15 PM, Ian Bull wrote: > Katya, > > This is exactly what I was thinking. In past, most p2 sessions are on 'how' > you can use p2. But, IMHO, we have now reached a point where people are now > doing some really exciting thinks 'with' p2. > > I don't know if we should collaboratively organize a single session (1 hour > session with 4-5 speakers), or if we should each submit individual talks and > ask the program committee to put the selected talks together. > > Chris, what do you think? > > Would others be interested in this sort of session? > > cheers, > ian > > On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Todorova, Katya <[email protected]> > wrote: > Hi, > > > It’s great that you’re organizing a larger scope session, which covers the > different aspects of using p2 as a technology. > > > In SAP we were internally discussing to propose two sessions on our usages of > p2: > > - Provisioning mechanism for cloud-based server runtime components, > leveraging the eclipse publishing functionality and composite repositories > > - Provisioning of updates and real-time configuration updates to a > large number of small embedded industry-specific devices. > > > Do you think we can cover those two in the general scope session? So far I > was planning to prepare the abstracts for both sessions as outlined. > > > Kind regards, > > Katya > > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Ian Bull > Sent: Donnerstag, 11. November 2010 04:50 > To: P2 developer discussions > Subject: Re: [p2-dev] EclipseCon talks > > > We could do another tutorial -- they are always popular -- but the general > tutorials are, well, too general. Any specific parts of p2 we can focus on? > > > Also, there are several of us (Sonatype, EclipseSource, Cloudsmith, IBM?), > who are building on top of p2. We could do a combined talk on how we exploit > the p2 API in interesting ways. > > > cheers, > > ian > > On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Pascal Rapicault <[email protected]> > wrote: > > alright, alright, I get it :) > > > On 2010-11-10, at 2:19 PM, Chris Aniszczyk wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 8:10 AM, Pascal Rapicault <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> Hey, > >> > >> EclipseCon deadline is soon approaching (another 20 day or so). > >> Please chime in your ideas on this list so we can better coordinate and > >> team up. > > > > You get a cookie and a better chance of getting talks accepted if you > > submit before Nov 17th... > > http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/submissions/?page=submissions > > > > -- > > Cheers, > > > > Chris Aniszczyk > > http://aniszczyk.org > > +1 860 839 2465 > > _______________________________________________ > > p2-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/p2-dev > > _______________________________________________ > p2-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/p2-dev > > > > > -- > R. Ian Bull | EclipseSource Victoria | +1 250 477 7484 > http://eclipsesource.com | http://twitter.com/eclipsesource > > > _______________________________________________ > p2-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/p2-dev > > > > > -- > R. Ian Bull | EclipseSource Victoria | +1 250 477 7484 > http://eclipsesource.com | http://twitter.com/eclipsesource > _______________________________________________ > p2-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/p2-dev
_______________________________________________ p2-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/p2-dev
