Happy Holidays!

On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 10:28 PM, Andrew Eisenberg <[email protected]>wrote:

> I did. I'm on vacation now. I'll get back to you in a couple of days
> when I am back. Thanks.
>
> On Thursday, December 23, 2010, Pascal Rapicault <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Where are we at on that? Did you open a bug?
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Andrew Eisenberg <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Here's what I have so far:
> >
> > 1. Unzip your favorite Eclipse distro of 3.6.1 (I used
> > eclipse-SDK-3.6.1-macosx-cocoa-x86_64.tar.gz)
> > 2. chmod -R 555 eclipse (or the appropriate variant on windows)
> > 3. Start eclipse
> > 4. open update manager
> > 5. Add update site
> > http://dist.codehaus.org/groovy/distributions/greclipse/snapshot/e3.6/
> > 6. Try to install.
> >
> > I get the error below.  It doesn't say anywhere (or at least it's not
> > saying it to me) that this is failing because of a read-only problem.
> >
> > Now, some users are able to "successfully" install, but on restart it
> > looks like JDT has been uninstalled (specifically, the
> > org.eclipse.jdt.core line has been deleted from the bundles.info
> > file).   Perhaps this is a windows-only problem.  I haven't been able
> > to track it down exactly yet.
> >
> > Cannot complete the install because of a conflicting dependency.
> >   Software being installed: Groovy-Eclipse Feature
> > 2.1.1.xx-20101124-2100-e36
> > (org.codehaus.groovy.eclipse.feature.feature.group
> > 2.1.1.xx-20101124-2100-e36)
> >   Software currently installed: Shared profile 1.0.0.1284044844810
> > (SharedProfile_SDKProfile 1.0.0.1284044844810)
> >   Only one of the following can be installed at once:
> >     Java Development Tools Core 3.6.1.xx-20101124-2100-e36
> > (org.eclipse.jdt.core 3.6.1.xx-20101124-2100-e36)
> >     Java Development Tools Core 3.6.1.v_A68_R36x (org.eclipse.jdt.core
> > 3.6.1.v_A68_R36x)
> >   Cannot satisfy dependency:
> >     From: Shared profile 1.0.0.1284044844810 (SharedProfile_SDKProfile
> > 1.0.0.1284044844810)
> >     To: org.eclipse.jdt.core [3.6.1.v_A68_R36x]
> >   Cannot satisfy dependency:
> >     From: Shared profile 1.0.0.1284044844810 (SharedProfile_SDKProfile
> > 1.0.0.1284044844810)
> >     To: org.eclipse.jdt.feature.group
> > [3.6.1.r361_v20100714-0800-7z8XFUSFLFlmgLc5z-Bvrt8-HVkH]
> >   Cannot satisfy dependency:
> >     From: Groovy-Eclipse Feature 2.1.1.xx-20101124-2100-e36
> > (org.codehaus.groovy.eclipse.feature.feature.group
> > 2.1.1.xx-20101124-2100-e36)
> >     To: org.codehaus.groovy.jdt.patch.feature.group
> [2.1.1.xx-20101124-2100-e36]
> >   Cannot satisfy dependency:
> >     From Patch: org.codehaus.groovy.jdt.patch.feature.group
> > 2.1.1.xx-20101124-2100-e36 Eclipse Java Development Tools
> > 3.6.1.r361_v20100714-0800-7z8XFUSFLFlmgLc5z-Bvrt8-HVkH
> > (org.eclipse.jdt.feature.group
> > 3.6.1.r361_v20100714-0800-7z8XFUSFLFlmgLc5z-Bvrt8-HVkH)
> >     To: org.eclipse.jdt.core [3.6.1.xx-20101124-2100-e36]
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Andrew Eisenberg <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> I believe that this is a problem with feature patches specifically.  I
> >> was aware of the shared install bug that was fixed for 3.6.1, but it
> >> doesn't seem to have fixed the feature patches issue (it only made
> >> diagnosing the problem more cryptic :( ).  I have not actually
> >> reproduced this on my machine.  I just know from users that when they
> >> changed their install directory to writable, then they were able to
> >> install groovy-eclipse.
> >>
> >> If there's not a straightforward solution, then should I write up some
> >> steps to reproduce and raise a bug?
> >>
> >> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Ian Bull <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>> Andrew,
> >>> This should work (install in a read-only directory). In this case,
> Eclipse
> >>> actually does the install ~<username>/.eclipse.  Of course, if that is
> also
> >>> read-only, then we are probably out of luck.
> >>> There was a bug in 3.6.0 that caused some problems, but that was fixed
> in
> >>> 3.6.1.
> >>> So a few questions, are you using 3.6.1? If you are using 3.6.1, are
> the
> >>> results predictable (or do you get different behavior  based on the
> weather
> >>> ;)?  I wonder if there is a problem with feature-patches and shared
> >>> installs.
> >>> cheers,
> >>> ian
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 8:45 AM, Andrew Eisenberg <[email protected]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi all,
> >
> >
>
_______________________________________________
p2-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/p2-dev

Reply via email to