Yep, this is good On 2011-02-22, at 8:45 AM, Oberlies, Tobias wrote:
> For the publisher refactorings, I'm wondering which changes are worth an > entry in the copyright notice header. From what I understand, only > significant changes should be listed. > > For the things we have done up to now, I'd draw the following line: > > - Add contribution entry for: > 1. org.eclipse.pde.publishing/build.properties - not much in there, so > changing the bundleName is kind of significant > 2. > /org.eclipse.equinox.p2.publisher/src/org/eclipse/equinox/spi/p2/publisher/PublisherHelper.java > and > /org.eclipse.equinox.p2.updatesite/src/org/eclipse/equinox/internal/p2/updatesite/RemoteFeaturesAction.java > - moved one public (plus one private) method from the former to the latter > > - Don't change copyright notice for: > a. all files that have just been moved. > b. all files where only imports (e.g. the Activator) changed. > c. technical files (like MANIFEST.MF) that don't have copyright notices > > Does this comply with Eclipse's IP policy? > > Regards > Tobias > > _______________________________________________ > p2-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/p2-dev _______________________________________________ p2-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/p2-dev
