Forgot to press submit :) Bug 338232 On 2011-02-25, at 10:22 AM, Dahanne, Anthony wrote:
> +1 for slf4j, with the logback implementation. > Furthermore, it is already in Orbit > http://download.eclipse.org/tools/orbit/downloads/drops/S20110124210048/ > Are you going to create a bug entry ? > Anthony > > > > Le contenu de ce courriel s'adresse au destinataire seulement. Il contient de > l'information pouvant être confidentielle. Vous ne devez ni le copier ni > l'utiliser ni le divulguer à qui que ce soit à moins que vous soyez le > destinataire ou une personne désignée autorisée. Si vous le receviez par > erreur, veuillez nous aviser immédiatement et le détruire. > > The contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee only. It > contains information that may be confidential. Unless you are the named > addressee or an authorized designee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose > it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify us immediately > and then destroy it. > > > De : [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] De la > part de Pascal Rapicault > Envoyé : Friday, February 25, 2011 10:17 AM > À : P2 developer discussions > Objet : [p2-dev] Improving logging in p2 > > Yesterday I have been involved in some fun p2 debugging sessions, and felt > first hand the awkwardness of our debug / logging story. > The bottom line is that our .options file story just does not cut it. It may > have been a good story 10 years ago but now it is an encumbrance. > > - It is a file that nobody knows about or knows how to enable, it relies on > keys that are specific to each part of the system and it does not compose > very well. > - The debug info is directly written out on the sysout (not the best place) > - Can't change the debugging level at runtime (or at least not easily) > > What I'm proposing is to change our debug logging to use slf4j. This pretty > much gets us out of the business of logging, and leave the final decision to > the integrator on which logging backend to use (log4j, logback, ...), and > only add 37k footprint (slf4j-api.jar). > For the p2 being shipped in the SDK, we could decide to include the logback > bundle to make it easy for ppl to use. > > What do you think? > > PaScaL > > > _______________________________________________ > p2-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/p2-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > p2-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/p2-dev
_______________________________________________ p2-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/p2-dev
