There is only one discussion point. Do we want a new class versus a setter?
Rather than focusing on the process, please review the API.

On 2011-04-20, at 11:30 AM, Jeff McAffer wrote:

> We seem to still be discussing the API. You seem to want to put it in now 
> (today) and sort it out later. I'd like the API to be more "agreed to" before 
> putting it in to M7 given the lateness of the hour.
> 
> Jeff
> 
> On 2011-04-20, at 10:43 AM, Pascal Rapicault wrote:
> 
>> The API has been ready since before eclipsecon. Dave and others reviewed it 
>> and it is good.
>> What do you propose instead? We wait 3.7.1?
>> 
>> On 2011-04-20, at 10:29 AM, Jeff McAffer wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>>> If there is no objection I will release that during the week so we can 
>>>> actually work on the code together.
>>> 
>>> I'm not a real fan of this approach in the last week of M7.  If bogus API 
>>> gets into M7 then we'll have a hell of a time removing/changing it.  We 
>>> almost always end up regretting those last minute pushes.  For the code 
>>> itself I don't care but releasing API that is not baked is less than 
>>> optimal.
>>> 
>>> Jeff
>>> 
>>> On 2011-04-19, at 1:30 PM, Pascal Rapicault wrote:
>>> 
>>>> This issue has been discussed at the end of M6 with Tom and it has been 
>>>> agreed at the time that we will add this new API in M7 (I had not foreseen 
>>>> it happening so late).
>>>> 
>>>> I just attached a new patch taking the feedback into account. The focus is 
>>>> on API since this is the most pressing issue for the rest of the week. The 
>>>> code needs to be polished. 
>>>> 
>>>> If there is no objection I will release that during the week so we can 
>>>> actually work on the code together.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 2011-04-19, at 9:27 AM, Jeff McAffer wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Darn. you are talking about 
>>>>> https://bu​gs.eclipse​.org/bugs/​show_bug.c​gi?id=3370​16?
>>>>> 
>>>>> That's new API right?  I took a look but am not sure what the final form 
>>>>> is that you are thinking of.  Susan had some comments and David as well.  
>>>>> The original patch from you had a method getAgent() which seems suspect 
>>>>> as it does effectively the ServiceHelper trick.  Do you have any examples 
>>>>> of this API in use.
>>>>> 
>>>>> If you are going to look to release this please post a new patch with the 
>>>>> proposed shape, some example use and mark for review.  Ideally we could 
>>>>> get John and/or DJ to review (I'll review as PMC guy).  Please do not 
>>>>> release until it has been reviewed.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Jeff
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 2011-04-18, at 5:22 PM, Pascal Rapicault wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Crap. Just a heads up that I stil need to release the new simplified API 
>>>>>> around the operations. I'll likely only get to that Friday.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 2011-04-18, at 3:21 PM, Thomas Watson wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> http://wiki.eclipse.org/Equinox/Meeting_Minutes/20110418
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> As a reminder M7 is next week. After that we head into rampdown for M7. 
>>>>>>> Please see http://eclipse.org/equinox/planning/freeze_plan_3.7.php for 
>>>>>>> more details on the process for ramping down the release.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Tom
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> equinox-dev mailing list
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> p2-dev mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/p2-dev
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> equinox-dev mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> equinox-dev mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> p2-dev mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/p2-dev
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> p2-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/p2-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> equinox-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev

_______________________________________________
p2-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/p2-dev

Reply via email to