I find the performance of using query language has great downgrade if
querying a repository with a great number of IUs. I'm not sure whether
it's a common case, at least it does in my case.
I already have a list of non-installed root and group IUs, I want to
query the non-installed IUs from repository that are required by those
root and group IUs.
I compare the different three methods to query different size of IUs.
They are using Provisioning planner to resolve and query the required
IUs, query language and a way to use for loop.
I publish my methods as a document[1], and query benchmark as a
spreadsheet[2].
Actually I prefer to use query language, the code looks like much
cleaner. Does anybody know why query language is quite slow to handle
with the great number of IUs, or how to tune my query expression?
[1]
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wfnr2d2TF4vIYDCMmWPuYd0kQA32WiWaXTiaCoJovho/edit
[2]
https://spreadsheets.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AmxBoq-n1R8KdEZ4czdpQk9lMEpvR3pUbzZaZzltTGc
--
Mengxin Zhu
_______________________________________________
p2-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/p2-dev
