No problem here, but is the issue that the incubator repository (I assume it's a single repo) is too large / complex? If so, then moving it to the p2 repo won't help much (as you said) :-).
cheers, ian On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Pascal Rapicault <[email protected]>wrote: > Thanks for your interest in p2CUDF. Moving it out of where it is located > should not be too much of an issue. > I will discuss with the others if they prefer having the code moved into a > specific git repo or merged with the existing p2 repo, and will check with > the foundation if any process needs to be followed. > For the repo structure, given how large the p2 repository is (both in size > and number of projects) I'm in favour of creating a specific repo. Ian, > Tom, any problems with that? > > Pascal > > > On 2012-08-20, at 4:44 AM, Adrien Lecharpentier wrote: > > Hello, > > For an open-source project named DORM, we would like to use the library > p2cudf from the incubation repository. > It would be great for this project to be hosted in its own repository git > or svn so we could easily use it and maybe contribute to it. > > Thanks in advance! > > -- Adrien > > -- > > *Adrien Lecharpentier* > Consultant et Formateur > Zenika, Paris Tél: +33 (0)6 28 55 08 51 > Email: [email protected] > Skype: adrien.lecharpentier > > _______________________________________________ > p2-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/p2-dev > > > -- R. Ian Bull | EclipseSource Victoria | +1 250 477 7484 http://eclipsesource.com | http://twitter.com/eclipsesource
_______________________________________________ p2-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/p2-dev
