I'm all for reducing the overhead. However was not that added to satisfy the requirements of automated tagging?
Pascal On 2012-09-04, at 4:50 PM, Ian Bull wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Due to the long weekend I forgot to merge master into integration this week. > This isn't very serious (since we are early in the development cycle), but it > means we need to wait another week to test changes, etc... I'm wondering if > we still need both branches for p2? Having two branches makes sense during > active development, where things may get committed that shouldn't be included > in a weekly integration build. However, for maintenance, it doesn't really > make sense -- especially when you consider we typically just merge everything > each week anyways. > > What do you think about building p2 from master each week? > > Cheers, > Ian > > -- > R. Ian Bull | EclipseSource Victoria | +1 250 477 7484 > http://eclipsesource.com | http://twitter.com/eclipsesource > _______________________________________________ > p2-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/p2-dev
_______________________________________________ p2-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/p2-dev
