2014-03-17 3:59 GMT+01:00 Michel Bauwens <[email protected]>: > *Socialist Licenses?* by Stefan Meretz -- From my perspective the > presentation of the GPL as "communist" is wrong, but this attribution has > the function to propagate a milder license variant which then is called > "socialist": the PPL > (Peer-Production-License)<http://p2pfoundation.net/Peer_Production_License>. > This license only grants external access to the resources to those who are > using them non-commercially, while internally unlimited exploitation is > allowed. (...) But what is commercial? >
That's an important aspect. On the PPL internally unlimited exploitation is allowed if *"You are a workerowned business or workerowned collective".* IMHO this is not sufficient to describe a Peer Production Organization. Is needed, as I before stated, a charter to define it.
_______________________________________________ P2P Foundation - Mailing list http://www.p2pfoundation.net https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation
